Category Archives: Resolutions

Town of Pittstown resolution to support Kathy Marchione’s repeal of the safe gun act

Resolution to support Kathy Marchione’s repeal of the safe gun act.  Passed unanimously March 11th

#29-2013

WHEREAS, the members of the Town Board of the Town of Pittstown desire to support Senator Kathy Marchione and Senate Bill S3948-2013, and her efforts to preserve and protect the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding New Yorkers by repealing or replacing restrictive sections of the NY SAFE Act, Section 58 of Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2013 of the State of New York and related provisions;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: King; Second: Demars that, the members of the Town Board of the Town of Pittstown would like to support Senator Kathy Marchione, Senate Bill S3948-2013 and her efforts to preserve and protect the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding New Yorkers by repealing or replacing restrictive sections of the NY SAFE Act, Section 58 of Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2013 of the State of New York and related provisions.

Vote: Ayes – all; Nays – none.

Town of Walton resolution opposing the SAFE Act

Town of Walton resolution opposing the SAFE Act passed unanimously.

TITLE: OPPOSITION TO THE New York STATE SAFE ACT

WHEREAS, the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.; and

WHEREAS, the right of the people to keep and bear arms for defense of life, liberty, and property is regarded as an inalienable right by the people of Delaware County and the Town of Walton; and

WHEREAS, the lawful ownership of firearms is, and has been, a valued tradition in the Town of Walton, and the rights protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution are exercised by many of our residents and visitors; and

WHEREAS, it is estimated that over 60 million individuals, representing over half of the households in America, have chosen to exercise that right by owning one or more firearms; and

WHEREAS, gun bans, registration, and licensing of firearms and their owners, has had little or no effect in such urban areas such as New York City, California, Chicago and Washington, D.C. and has not prevented violent criminals from obtaining firearms illegally and committing crimes; and

WHEREAS, the people of Walton derive economic and environmental benefits from all safe forms of recreation involving firearms, including, but not limited to, hunting and target shooting while utilizing all types of firearms available under the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, members of the Walton Town Board, being elected to represent the people of Walton, are duly sworn by their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, members of the New York State Assembly and the New York State Senate, being elected by the people of New York State, are duly sworn by their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the enactment of the NY SAFE Act (Chapter I of the Laws of 2013) has engendered significant controversy over both the process by which it was enacted and certain provisions contained within it; and

WHEREAS, it is our understanding that many State Legislators had less than an hour to read the legislation, which contained approximately twenty-five thousand words, before being forced to vote on it; and

WHEREAS, having reviewed the legislation and time constraints, it is our conclusion that there is no possible way any individual could have read the entire bill and understood its full implications prior to voting on it; and

WHEREAS, our State Legislators most certainly could not have had the time to request, and receive, the input of their constituents regarding this matter; and

WHEREAS, this legislation has 60 sections, of which only three take effect immediately and in our opinion, there was no reason for the Governor to use a message of necessity to bring this bill to vote immediately and bypass the three-day maturing process for all legislation; and

WHEREAS, law-abiding gun owners are required to verify ownership of certain types of firearms every five years, in addition to registering them on their permits, which now also must  be renewed every five years, does not increase the safety of the public and is unnecessarily burdensome to the residents of New York State; and

WHEREAS, there will be a significant negative financial impact due to the approximately 14,000 Delaware County permits that will have to be renewed requiring additional manpower and computer systems and is another un-funded mandate; and

WHEREAS, this legislation prohibits the sale of firearm magazines with a capacity larger than seven rounds.  Those firearm magazines with a capacity larger than seven rounds, which are authorized to be retained by existing owners, may only be loaded with seven rounds and eventually must be permanently altered to only accept seven rounds or be disposed of, thus constituting a seizure of legally-owned personal property with no provision for compensation; and

WHEREAS, few or no low capacity (7 rounds or less) magazines currently exist for many of the firearms commonly possessed by law-abiding residents of New York State; and

WHEREAS, Governor Cuomo has proposed spending $36 million dollars in his 2013- 2014 Executive budget for the implementation of the NY SAFE Act at a time when New York State residents are crying out for tax relief; and

WHEREAS, Delaware County Sheriff Thomas E. Mills has said that he “fully understands his constitutional obligations and the concerns of his citizens” and further states “under this new legislation, if called upon to go door to door to confiscate newly classified assault weapons, will not do so”; and

WHEREAS, while there are some areas of the legislation such as privacy protections for certain of pistol permit holders, by-and-large, we find the legislation does little more than negatively impact lawful gun ownership; and

WHEREAS, this legislation fails to offer any meaningful solutions to gun violence and places increased burdens where they do not belong, squarely on the backs of lawabiding citizens. This legislation effectively turns countless New York State law-abiding gun owners into criminals; and

WHEREAS, the manner in which this legislation was brought forward for vote in the State Legislature is deeply disturbing to the Walton Town Board; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Walton Town Board does hereby oppose, and request the repeal of, any legislation, including the sections within the NY SAFE Act (Chapter I of the Laws of 2013), which infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Walton Town Board considers such laws to be unconstitutional  and beyond lawful legislative authority granted to our State representatives; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Walton Town Board strongly encourages members of the New York State Legislature to hold public hearings to address the issue of gun violence in a way that will produce meaningful results; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Walton Town Board requests the members of the New York State Senate and Assembly who represent all, or part of, Delaware County to reply, in writing, with their views on, and actions taken, in support of, or opposition to, the NY SAFE Act; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be sent to President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Congressman Chris Gibson, New York State Majority Coalition President and Leader Dean Skelos, New York State Senator Jeffrey Klein, New York State Senators James Seward, John J. Bonacic, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, New York State Assembly Minority Leader Brian Kolb, New York State Senate Assembly members  Cliff Crouch, Claudia Tenney , and Peter Lopez.

RESOLUTION #40 OPPOSITION TO THE NEW YORK STATE SAFE ACT

A motion was made by Councilman Armstrong, seconded by Rodriguez-Betancourt approving a resolution in Opposition To the New York State Safe Act.  All in favor, motion carried.

Town of Highlands resolution opposing the SAFE Act

RESOLUTION OF MARCH 11, 2013

NY SAFE ACT

Council Member Gunza moved the following resolution which was seconded by Council Member Edsall.

Whereas, the Town of Highlands Town Council does reaffirm its oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York; and

Whereas, the NY SAFE Act, which was signed into law on January 15, 2013 did not proceed through the usual process and may have benefited by further thought; and

Whereas, the NY SAFE Act has sections that are being challenged and may need further improvement; and

Whereas, the NY SAFE Act has certain sections that are beneficial to the public

Now Therefore Be It Resolved that the Town of Highlands Town Board requests our New York State Legislators to review and work toward necessary corrections, clarifications and improvements to the NY SAFE Act and amend it as necessary; and

Be It Further Resolved that a copy of this resolution be sent to Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator William Larkin and Assemblyman James Skoufis.

The question of the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly put to a vote which resulted as follows:

William Edsall, Council Member Aye

James Stradley, Council Member Absent

June Gunza, Council Member Aye

Holly Gokey, Council Member Aye

Mervin R. Livsey, Supervisor Aye

The foregoing constitutes a true and complete copy of a resolution duly made, seconded and adopted at a meeting of the Town Board, Town of Highlands, on March 11, 2013.

Town of Porter resolution against the SAFE Act

NY SAFE Act

Resolution to support Niagara County’s opposition to the NY SAFE Act, signed by Governor Cuomo a few weeks ago. Councilman White made this motion with Councilman Fleckenstein seconding at the February 25th work session. It was decided to hold the vote until this Board meeting. Councilman White wants to be on record he is in favor of the resolution even though he is not present tonight.

RESULT:  ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER:  Jeff Baker, Councilman
SECONDER:  Joe Fleckenstein, Councilman
AYES:  Mert Wiepert, Thomas Baia, Jeff Baker, Joe Fleckenstein
ABSENT:  Larry White

Town of Preble resolution calling for repeal of the NY SAFE act

Motion made by Linda Riehlman, seconded by Peter Knapp
RESOLUTION #20:

To authorize the Supervisor, James Doring, and Town Clerk, Jane Davenport, to complete the declaration regarding the Second Amendment and forward same to CC Chairman Mike Park; Governor Mario Cuomo; Senator James Seward; Assembly Member 125th District Barbara Lifton; Assembly Member 129th District Brian M. Kolf, and Assembly Member 123rd District Gary Finch

Peter Knapp(aye), Dave Morse(aye) Linda Riehlman(aye)

WHEREAS, The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms is guaranteed as an Individual Right under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution of the State of New York, and;

WHEREAS, The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms for defense of Life, Liberty, and property, is regarded as an Inalienable Right by the People of the Town of Preble, New York, and;

WHEREAS, the People of the Town of Preble, New York, derive economic benefit and recreation from all safe forms of firearms conducted within the Town of Preble using all types of firearms allowable under the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York, and;

WHEREAS, The New York Assembly and the New York Senate, being duly elected by the People of the State of New York and being duly sworn by their Oath of Office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York, and;

WHEREAS, the legislation passed by the New York State Legislature and signed by the Governor on January 15 infringes upon the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and bans the possession and use of firearms now employed by individual citizens of the Town of Preble, New York, for defense of Life, Liberty and Property and bans the possession and use of firearms now legally owned for safe forms of firearms conducted within the Town of Preble, New York;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND HEREBY RESOLVED that the Town of Preble’s Board, hereby calls for the repeal of the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 and declares that such legislation infringes upon the Right of People to Keep and Bear Arms, thereby considers such an act an over reach of legislative authority and is unconstitutional.

Town of Lake Pleasant resolution opposing the SAFE Act

Town of Lake Pleasant resolution opposing the SAFE Act passed unanimously.

Town of Lake Pleasant

Resolution No. 28

DATED: March 4, 2013

The following RESOLUTION was adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Lake Pleasant, at a regular meeting held on March 4, 2013.

SUPPORTING THE NEW YORK STATE SHERIFFS’ ASSOCIATION’S POSITION ON GOVERNOR CUOMO’S NEW YORK SAFE ACT

On a motion made by Supervisor Neil McGovern 2nd by Councilperson Betsy Bain

WHEREAS, the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, as well as the Civil Rights Law of the State of New York, and

WHEREAS, Sheriffs represent all the people and they take an oath to uphold the
Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York, and

WHEREAS, Sheriffs enforce all laws of the state and will protect the rights of all citizens, including those rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York, and

WHEREAS, Sheriff Karl G. Abrams attended the New York State Sheriffs’ Association Winter Conference on January 22,2013 to January 24, 2013 in which 52 of 58 New York State’s Sheriffs were present and discussed Governor Cuomo’s SAFE Act, and

WHEREAS, Sheriff Karl G. Abrams and other members of the New York State Sheriffs’ Association identified the following six provisions of the new law, which they believe are helpful and will increase the safety of our citizens, and

WHEREAS, the six provisions are as follows:

1.  Restriction on FOIL requests about pistol permit holders. By granting citizens the option of having their names and addresses withheld from public disclosure, the new law does provide a mechanism to allow people to decide for themselves whether their personal information should be accessible to the public. We believe, however, that no one should have to explain why their personal information should remain confidential. A better procedure, we believe, is simply to exempt all this personal information from FOIL disclosure.

2.  Killing of emergency first responders.  The new law makes killing of emergency first responders aggravated or first degree murder, enhancing penalties for this crime and requiring life without parole. First responders need this protection, evidenced all too often by attacks on them when they attempt to provide help, and in special recognition of the terrible attacks on two firefighters in Webster, NY and attacks on first responders in Jefferson County.

3.  Requirement of NICS checks for private sales (except between immediate family). We believe that this will ensure that responsible citizens will still be able to obtain legal firearms through private transactions, with the added assurance that private buyers are approved by the federal National Instant Criminal Background Check System. We remain concerned that this provision will be very difficult to enforce and will likely only affect law abiding citizens.
4.  Comprehensive review of mental health records before firearms permits are granted and review of records to determine if revocation of permits is required. Sheriffs believe that there is an urgent need to increase funding for mental health care. The new law imposes reporting requirements on many mental health care professionals and others who may make a determination that a person is a danger to himself or others.  The law further gives needed authority to courts or others who issue firearm permits to deny permit applications or to revoke permits already issued. We believe that this issue demands a much more full and detailed discussion about how to keep guns out of the hands of such people. The Sheriffs of New York want to pursue these issues with the Governor and the State Legislature.

5.   Safe storage of firearms. The new law provides that guns must be safely stored if the owner lives with someone who has been convicted of a felony or domestic violence crime, has been involuntarily committed, or is currently under an order of protection. We agree that firearms owners should have the responsibility to make sure that their weapons are safeguarded against use or access by prohibited persons, and the new law adds these protections to ensure that weapons are safely and securely stored.

6.  Increased penalties for illegal use of weapons. The new law adds several increased sanctions for violation of New York gun laws and creates new gun crimes which did not previously exist. These new provisions will provide added tools for law enforcement to prosecute such crimes. We further believe that the new provisions should help deter future misuse of firearms. We also suggest that the legislature consider limitations on plea bargaining for all gun crimes.

and

WHEREAS, Sheriff Karl G. Abrams and other members of the New York State Sheriffs’ Association reviewed other provisions of the new law, and strongly believe that many modifications are needed to clarify the intent of some of these new provisions and that revisions are needed to allow Sheriffs to properly enforce the law in their county, and

WHEREAS, the modifications are as follows:

1. Assault weapon ban and definition of assault weapons. We believe that the new definition of assault weapons is too broad, and prevents the possession of many weapons that are legitimately used for hunting, target shooting and self defense. Classifying firearms as assault weapons because of one arbitrary feature effectively deprives people the right to possess firearms which have never before been designated as assault weapons. We are convinced that only law abiding gun owners will be affected by these new provisions, while criminals will still have and use whatever weapons they want.

2.  Inspection of schools bv state agencies. The new law transfers to state
agencies the responsibility to review school safety plans. We expect that
funding will be transferred to these state agencies to implement safety
proposals. Sheriffs and local police provide this service in all parts of the
state and can perform these duties efficiently. As the chief law enforcement officer of the county, Sheriffs are in the best position to know the security needs of schools in their own counties, and the state should help to fund these existing efforts by Sheriffs and local police departments to keep our schools safe. Because Sheriffs and local police are already deeply involved with school safety plans, have developed emergency response plans, and are familiar with structural layouts of schools in their counties, they should be included along with state counterparts in any effort to review school safety plans.

Reduction of ammunition magazine capacity. The new law enacts reductions in the maximum capacity of gun magazines. We believe based on our years of law enforcement experience that this will not reduce gun violence. The new law will unfairly limit the ability of law abiding citizens to purchase firearms in New York. It bears repeating that it is our belief that the reduction of magazine capacity will not make New Yorkers or our communities safer.

Five year recertification of pistol permit status and registration of existing assault weapons. The new law delegates to the State Police the duty to solicit and receive updated personal information of permit holders every five years in order to maintain these permits. Further, the law requires owners of certain existing firearms now classified as assault weapons to register these with the State Police within one year. The recertification and registration conflict with Sheriffs’ duties regarding issuance of pistol permits. All records should be maintained at the local, and not the state level. This information should be accessible to those who are responsible for initial investigation of permit applications. Pistol permit information should be maintained in one file at the local level, and forwarded to a statewide database for law enforcement use. It bears repeating that it is our belief that pistol permit and any registration information required by the law should be confidential and protected from FOIL disclosure.

Sale of ammunition. The new law imposes several new provisions regarding how, and from whom, ammunition can be lawfully purchased.  The law should be clarified about the use of the Internet as a vehicle for these sales, out of state sales to New York residents, and other issues.  Businesses have said that they do not understand the new provisions and are concerned that they will have to cease operations.

Law enforcement exemptions must be clarified. The new law has many provisions that might apply to law enforcement officers and there has been much confusion about whether existing law enforcement exemptions continue to apply. We understand that the Governor and Legislature have already agreed to review and modify these provisions where necessary, and the Sheriffs want to be part of the discussion to make the changes effective. Additionally, the exemptions should apply to retired police and peace officers and to others in the employ of the Sheriff and other police agencies that perform security duties at public facilities and events.

Method of bill passage. It is the view of the Sheriffs’ Association that anytime government decides it is necessary or desirable to test the boundaries of a constitutional right that it should only be done with caution and with great respect for those constitutional boundaries.  Further, it should only be done if the benefit to be gained is so great and certain that it far outweighs the damage done by the constriction of individual liberty. While many of the provisions of the new law have surface appeal, it is far from certain that all, or even many, of them will have any significant effect in reducing gun violence, which is the presumed goal of all of us. Unfortunately the process used in adoption of this act did not permit the mature development of the arguments on either side of the debate, and thus many of the stakeholders in this important issue are left feeling ignored by their government. Even those thrilled with the passage of this legislation should be concerned about the process used to secure its passage, for the next time they may find themselves the victim of that same process. Fortunately, the Governor has shown himself open to working with interested parties to address some of the problems that arose due to the hasty enactment of this law.  We will work with the Governor and the Legislature on these issues.

WHEREAS, Sheriff Karl G. Abrams understands his Constitutional obligations and the concerns of constituents. Sheriff Karl G. Abrams and his Deputies are not called upon by this new legislation to go door to door to confiscate any weapons newly classified as assault weapons, and will not do so, and

WHEREAS, Sheriff Karl G. Abrams along with Hamilton County Clerk Jane S. Zarecki are asking for the Hamilton County Board of Supervisors to support the New York State Sheriffs’ Association’s Position to Governor Cuomo’s NY SAFE Act, be it

RESOLVED, that the Hamilton County Board of Supervisors are supporting the New York State Sheriffs’ Association’s Position to Governor Cuomo’s NY SAFE Act, and be it further

RESOLVED, that certified copies of this Resolution be forwarded to the Governor of the State of New York Andrew M. Cuomo, Senator Hugh T. Farley, Assemblyman Marc Butler, New York State Association of Counties and the New York State Sheriffs’ Association.

AYES: ALL Councilman Mike O’Connor, Councilman Robert Peck, Councilperson Betsy Bain, Councilperson Nancy Germain, Supervisor Neil McGovern

NAYS: NONE

Town of Ontario resolution opposing the NY SAFE Act

RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO SAFE NEW YORK AND THE PROCESS OF ENACTMENT

WHEREAS, the United States Constitution second amendment, as well as New York State Civil Rights Law, guarantee our citizens the right to keep and bear arms; and

WHEREAS, the people of the Town of Ontario derive economic and environmental benefits from all safe forms of recreation involving firearms, including hunting and target shooting; and

WHEREAS, this legislation creates an environment in our area and across the state which is hostile to gun manufactures and those who sell and service firearms; and

WHEREAS, requiring law-abiding gun owners to verify ownership of certain types of firearms every five years, in addition to registering them on their permits, which now also must be renewed every five years, does not increase the safety of the public and is an unnecessarily burdensome to the residents of the Town of Ontario and New York State; and

WHEREAS, NY SAFE ACT fails to offer any meaningful solutions to gun violence and places increased burdens on our law abiding citizens; and

WHEREAS, the manner in which this legislation was brought forward for vote in the State Legislature is deeply disturbing to the Ontario Town Board asking for a vote in only 22 minutes rather than following the Legislatures own 3 day rule and not allowing any testimony from a variety of knowledgeable people; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, that the Ontario Town Board add its voice in opposition along with the Wayne County Legislative Board and a number of Wayne County towns to the NY SAFE Act (Chapter1 of the Laws of 2013), and request the repeal of any legislation, including the sections within the NY SAFE ACT which infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms; and further be it

RESOLVED, that the Ontario Town Board strongly encourages members of the New York State Legislature to hold public hearings to address the issue of gun violence in a way that will produce meaningful results; and further be it

RESOLVED, the Ontario Town Board opposes the imposition of any fees on New York State gun owners to finance the new provisions of the SAFE Act and any costs associated with the implementation of the SAFE Act must be borne by the State; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Clerk of the Town of Ontario certify and communicate this resolution to New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo; US Senator Charles Schumer of New York; US Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York; US Congressman Daniel Maffei of New York, representing the 24th District; New York State Senator Michael Nozzolio, representing the 54th District; New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, representing 65th District; and New York State Assemblyman Robert Oaks, representing 130th District.

Chemung County resolution opposing the NY SAFE Act

Passed unanimously March 11th.

RESOLUTION NO. 13-156

Resolution calling for the repeal of the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013

By: Graubard
Seconded by: Bennett

WHEREAS, the New York State Legislature recently enacted and Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law The New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (“NY SAFE ACT”); and

WHEREAS, this Legislation is viewed by many citizens of the State of New York as being extremely controversial as those citizens view this Legislation as infringing upon their rights guaranteed to them under the Second Amendment of the United State Constitution; and

WHEREAS, each and every issue that comes before the New York State Legislature before an enactment deserves a fair and open discussion which incorporates all points of view in order to ensure that all citizens are heard and that the Legislation incorporates the various points of view expressed during that discussion and the Legislation benefits all of the citizens of the State of New York; and

WHEREAS, the NY SAFE ACT was adopted after minimal public discussion, contains serious flaws, i.e., police officers are not exempt, and after having been on the desks of the members of the New York State Legislature for only a few hours, thereafter was literally adopted literally in the night and signed into law by Governor Andrew Cuomo; and

WHERESAS, in 2011 amendments were made to the Open Meetings Law (Public Officers Law Section 103), requiring a public body prior to a meeting to post on its website, to the extent practicable, for public benefit, all records that may be considered or discussed at that meeting; and

WHEREAS, A.107 has been pre-filed before the New York State Assembly for the 2013-2014 Regular Session, to amend the Public Officers Law (Sections 84 and 90) in relation to publishing records of public interest by agencies and the State Legislature, reading in part “…The people’s right to know the process of governmental decision-making and to review the documents and statistics leading to determinations is basic to our society. Access to such information should not be thwarted by shrouding it with the cloak of secrecy or confidentiality…”; and

WHEREAS, the State of New York has a tradition and long history of conducting its deliberations and debates in the public view and that in the enactment of the NY SAFE ACT the New York State Legislature and Governor Andrew Cuomo acted in contradiction of this long, time honored tradition of an open government; and

WHEREAS, the members of the Chemung County Legislature wish to express their concern that any future legislation which addresses the ownership of guns and the sale of ammunition in the State of New York be conducted only after an open debate pursuant to which the public is allowed to participate and express their points of view; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, that the Chemung County Legislature calls for the repeal of the NY SAFE ACT; and, be it further

RESOLVED, that the Chemung County Legislature supports the positions on the NY SAFE ACT as expressed by the New York State County Clerks Association and the New York State Sheriffs Association; and, be it further

RESOLVED, that the Clerk of the Legislature be and she hereby is directed to forward certified copies of this resolution to Governor Cuomo, members of the New York State Legislature, NYSAC, NACo, New York State Association of Towns, and each New York State County.

Ayes: Pastrick, Manchester, Sweet, Brennan, Graubard, Milliken, Woodard, Hitchcock, Bennett, Jackson, Milazzo, Madl, Strange, Draxler (Chair) (14); Excused: Hyland (1); Opposed: None

Essex County: A Message from Sheriff Cutting in regards to NY SAFE Act

The recent NY Safe Act gun legislation is one of the most controversial pieces of law that I have seen in over 35 years of law enforcement experience.

I can assure you that I have no intention of going door to door to pick up any weapons legally owned by any Essex County residents, nor does any other Sheriff in New York State.

This legislation was very hastily constructed and passed without significant discussion or input from law enforcement or citizens and as such is now in a very transitory state as it has dozens of proposed amendments to fix oversights.

I recently returned from the winter conference of New York State Sheriffs and this was the primary issue addressed during this multi-day event.  One voice in the wilderness can be heard, but not very loudly.  However, the combined voices of all of the Sheriffs of New York State should resonate in the Capital as the voice of the people.  The Sheriffs Association drafted and presented a 4 page position statement on this legislation to the Governor.  To view this document, you can click on the link in this page.

The Sheriffs of New York State are diligently working to have this legislation amended into a document that does what it was intended to do and, more importantly, not infringe on the rights of the legal, law abiding citizens of our state.

Basically, this has some very good provisions that will help to keep weapons out of the hands of those who should not have them, such as the mentally ill and convicted felons.  This law increases background checks and information available to law enforcement to help avoid gun possession by those who pose an increased risk of tragic use of weapons.

Increased penalties for illegal gun possession and use are important and the added section protecting our firefighters is long overdue.

However, I personally do not see how limiting magazine capacity or arbitrarily banning certain weapons based on a few features as being very effective at preventing anyone from perpetrating these tragic acts of violence once they have committed to this senseless course of action.  Violent crime is related to a willingness to resort to violence not the presence of guns or weapons.

It makes no more sense to demonize weapons based on appearance than it does to demonize a car for DWI accidents or a deck of cards for gambling addiction.

This legislation is a start, albeit it a misguided one, but in my opinion, mental health treatment and issues would be the better place to begin to address these senseless killings.

Essex County Sheriff page

Oneida County Sheriff Maciol’s position on the NY SAFE act

Sheriff Maciol responds to the New York SAFE Act.

Over the past few weeks, a number of county residents have inquired as to Sheriff Maciol’s position regarding the recently passed New York SAFE Act.  Sheriff Maciol had this to say, “As a gun owner and strong supporter of the Second Amendment, I do not support any part of this law that restricts the law abiding citizens of Oneida County and standby the position previously articulated by the New York State Sheriffs’ Association.”

Since Governor Cuomo’s announcement of the NY SAFE Act, Sheriff Maciol, along with  Undersheriff Robert Swenszkowski, have been diligently educating themselves about this new law.  As it pertains to the NY SAFE Act, the Sheriff and Undersheriff have researched the powers of the Office of Sheriff, related case law, and statutory duties, in order to evaluate the legal authority of the Sheriff.  “It is not my prerogative to pick and choose which laws I want to enforce and which I don’t.  Such discrimination would be merely a different form of the “tyranny” which some feel the NY SAFE Act embodies.” said Sheriff Maciol.  The Sheriff believes that such arbitrary use of executive power to determine who shall be subject to the law and who shall not, is the very definition of tyranny.

The Sheriff cannot abstain from enforcing laws based on his own interpretation that it may conflict with the Constitution.  Chief Justice John Marshall famously said, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.”  Accordingly, it is up to the court system to decide whether the law is unconstitutional or not.  This is a basic function of our system of checks and balances between the three branches of government, and is reserved entirely to the judiciary.  The process of judicial review is already at work throughout New York in a number of cases brought before various courts in the state.  A Buffalo-area lawyer has gone to court contending the ban is unconstitutional and a judge there has ordered the state to answer by April.  Over 1000 people that have joined as plaintiffs and filed suit in Albany County Court contending the governor’s use of a Message of Necessity to push the bill through was flawed.  State lawyers will have to be in court on March 11, 2013 to explain why the court shouldn’t issue an injunction halting the law.  Additionally, there is a pending lawsuit originating out of Westchester County also addressing the NY SAFE Act.  This is the process that citizens must abide by, which was established by our founding fathers.  There also remains the possibility of the repeal of the NY SAFE Act through legislative action.  Citizens are encouraged to contact their respective Senators and Assemblypersons to give them input on this issue.

During the 2013 New York State Sheriff’s Association’s winter conference, Sheriff Maciol, along with Undersheriff Swenszkowski, participated in the drafting of the NYSSA letter in response to the NY SAFE Act and continue to stand by the responsible actions of the Association and its members.  The NYSSA Association letter to Governor Cuomo was supported by Sheriff Maciol and 51 fellow Sheriffs of New York.

The NY SAFE act has a number of implementations that will help law enforcement and the public for enhancing effective gun control regarding individuals that should not have access to weapons.  However, there are many parts of this law, such as the redefinition of “assault weapon” and the ammunition capacity restraints, that will not contribute meaningfully towards crime prevention.  Sheriff Maciol believes restrictions in this law will only affect law abiding citizens and encroaches on the Second Amendment, and because of this he does not support it.  Sheriff Maciol states, “I consider the manner that the NY SAFE Act was deliberated and passed to be irresponsible and a disservice to the citizens of New York State .  I will continue to advocate that changes be made to the NY SAFE Act to restore the rights of gun owners that have been so carelessly taken away.”

The people of New York State are in a unique situation as they now have a state gun control law that is even more restrictive than the federal regulations being considered.  Sheriff Maciol is calling upon the NY State Senate and Assembly to revise the NY SAFE Act restrictions on magazine capacity, assault weapon classification, and registration of such weapons, to mirror the law prior to the NY SAFE Act being implemented.

Sheriff Maciol feels that In addition to the recommendations of the New York State Sheriff’s Association, focus should also be concentrated on the criminal element in relation to firearms enforcement.  Funding could then be directed to county law enforcement agencies in order to combat gun crimes and the criminals that possess guns illegally through the creation of task forces, localgun reward programs, and shared intelligence within the law enforcement community.

Sheriff Maciol declared, “I am fortunate to live in a country which allows me to voice my displeasure with the very law I am required to enforce.  But I cannot, in good conscience avail myself of one right conferred by the Constitution, and at the same time assume the authority conferred by that same document to others within our system of government.  To forego due process and ignore the law as it stands, would be an injustice to the people of this County, and would be as abhorrent to the Constitution as some say this new law is. Our government has a duty to its citizens to preserve their rights and not infringe upon them.  The office I hold is one of great importance. It calls for responsible decisions and actions.  I hold the Oath of Office I took to defend the Constitution very seriously and whole heartedly stand by it and the citizens of Oneida County .”