Category Archives: Resolutions

Town of Stockholm resolution opposing the NY SAFE act

The Stockholm Town Board held their monthly meeting on May 14, 2013. At that meeting the following Resolution was brought to the board by Supervisor Decker. Upon a motion by Councilman Matthew White, seconded by Councilwoman Nancy Lynch and unanimously approved by a roll call vote the following became Resolution 09-2013.

RESOLUTION 09-2013
OPPOSING A NUMBER OF PROVISIONS ENACTED UNDER THE
NEW YORK SAFE ACT AND THE MANNER IN WHICH IT WAS ENACTED

WHEREAS, the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States, specifically the Second Amendment to the Constitution, guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms and states further that the right “shall not be infringed,” and;

WHEREAS, many residents of the Town of Stockholm have expressed their displeasure not only with the provisions of the NY SAFE Act itself, but also the insufficient amount of time the very lengthy bill was available for review;

WHEREAS, while there are provisions of the bill that have merit, other sections of the law should be reconsidered;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Stockholm joins with the many county and town boards in opposing those portions of the NY SAFE Act which infringes upon the rights of lawful gun owners and does little to address the underlying issues that confront our society;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town of Stockholm strongly encourages the members of the New York State Legislature to bring forth a bill that address the real problems confronted by today’s society and not jeopardize the rights of law-abiding citizens, and;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this Resolution will be sent to all our New York State Representatives.

This is to certify that I, Mary Jo Thompson, Town Clerk of the Town of Stockholm in the said County of St. Lawrence compared the foregoing copy of Resolution 09-2013 with the original now on file in this office, and that the same is a correct and true transcript of such original and the whole thereof.

In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Town this 15th day of May 2013.

_______________________________________
Mary Jo Thompson, Town Clerk
Town of Stockholm

Town of Clermont resolution calling for repeal of the SAFE act

RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE PROCESS OF ENACTMENT OF AND CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE NEW YORK SAFE ACT

WHEREAS, The Town Board of Clermont has long advocated for protection of the rights afforded to citizens under the Constitution, which has for generations guided our Nation and served as a framework to our democracy and society; and

WHEREAS, The Second Amendment of the United States provides for the “right of the people to keep and bear arms” and further states that this right “shall not be infringed”, and that this right has been a bedrock of our nation for over two centuries; and

WHEREAS, The New York State Legislature has recently adopted legislation, the NY Safe Act, proposed by Governor Cuomo to curtail these rights through the enactment of various anti-gun measures that will significantly impact legal gun owners and various businesses and suppliers of guns and related supplies and equipment; and

WHEREAS, This legislation was approved with scant public notice, very little public debate or review by State Lawmakers, and in the days since the legislation was introduced and enacted, concerns have arisen regarding various matters of law and potential defects in the legislation; and

WHEREAS, the Clermont Town Board believes that portions of the Act are necessary and will in fact increase the safety of the citizens. However, other provisions of the Act appear to be unnecessary, arbitrary, ill-advised and contrary rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court and the Courts of the State of New York; and

WHEREAS, the Clermont Town Board believes that an issue of this seriousness and effect should have been granted a respectful and appropriate period of debate, review and consideration; and

WHEREAS, As New York State already has some of the toughest gun legislation in the Country, including the Sullivan Act, and concerns have been voiced that this legislation will not improve public safety in the state, including concerns by Legislators who initially supported the legislation; and

WHEREAS, Additionally, Federal Lawmakers and the President are also considering legislation or executive orders that would further infringe on the Second Amendment; and

WHEREAS, This legislation will unfairly affect the rights of the many law-abiding gun owners in the Town of Clermont and New York State who are granted the right to keep and bear arms under the Constitution; and

WHEREAS, This legislation also does not adequately address the many acts of violence committed by criminals who are likely to ignore this legislation, and does not address the concerns of many residents, particularly those in rural communities, to possess firearms for the purpose of home or self defense, in accordance with the provisions of the Second Amendment; and

WHEREAS, this Legislation imposes a number of unfunded mandates on County government and taxpayers; and

WHEREAS, as written, the Act increases the stigma on the mentally ill; and

WHEREAS, 52 Counties, over 180 towns, and numerous law enforcement and other organizations have enacted resolutions opposing both the process of enactment of the Act as well as certain provisions contained therein; and

WHEREAS, The Clermont Town Board does hereby affirm support for the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the rights afforded to residents under the Constitution, and opposes attempts to infringe on those rights; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the Clermont Town Board affirms support for the Second Amendment, and states opposition to the legislation NY Safe Act adopted by the State Legislature restricting the rights of gun owners, and opposes attempts on the Federal level to implement new restrictions on these rights; and, be it further

RESOLVED, That this Legislative Body further requests that the NY Safe Act be repealed during the current state legislative session; and, be it further

RESOLVED, That the Clerk of this Legislative Body is hereby directed to transmit certified copies of this resolution to U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, U.S. Representative Chris Gibson, Governor Andrew Cuomo, State Senator Kathy Marchione, and Assemblywoman Didi Barrett.

Town of Clermont resolution opposing frivolous use of messages of necessity

RESOLUTION OPPOSING FRIVOLOUS USE OF MESSAGES OF NECESSITY AND CALLING FOR DUE PROCESS IN NEW YORK LEGISLATIVE PROCESS FOR THE PROTECTION OF CIVIL LIBERTIES AND RIGHTS

WHEREAS, the Town Board of Clermont has long advocated for due process and careful and deliberate consideration of all legislative acts, in particular those which are controversial or have far reaching consequences; and

WHEREAS, the bedrock of the United States of America and its Constitutional form of government is its formation as a nation of law with due process and deliberation; and

WHEREAS, the New York State Constitution recognizes the need of due process, careful deliberation, and transparency in government by declaring that except in times of emergency, “no bill shall be passed or become a law unless it shall have been printed and upon the desks of the members, in its final form, at least three calendar legislative days prior to its final passage”; and

WHEREAS, the New York State Constitutional Conventions of 1915 and 1938 foresaw the danger of indiscriminate use of messages of necessity, the 1915 convention proposing an outright ban on messages of necessity, and the 1938 convention amending the constitution to require the Governor to certify the facts of the emergency and noting: “it is the hope of the members of the committee that if the Governor is required to certify facts which in his opinion constitute an emergency, it will not fall into a pro forma signing of a printed message…”; and

WHEREAS, the use of messages of necessity has sadly indeed become a pro forma convention used to cut short debate and pass controversial legislation in direct contravention to the spirit of the New York State Constitution; and

WHEREAS, messages of necessity have been used over 1,200 times since 1995, including 29 times by Governor Cuomo in 2011, 23 times by governor Spitzer in 2007, and 34 times by Governor Pataki in 2005; and

WHEREAS, messages of necessity have been used to pass controversial legislation such as the Redistricting Statute, the Tier VI Pensions, DNA Database, Teacher Evaluations, and Same Sex Marriage; and

WHEREAS, the Teacher Evaluation act has become a burden and unfunded mandate on local schools, and it seems to many that the end result will be more paperwork and less time for teaching; and

WHEREAS, the Same Sex Marriage act has been recognized to infringe on religious liberties and individual’s consciences, and causes a reduction in needed services when religious organizations are forced by law to stop providing a service or violate their conscience.

RESOLVED, The Town Board of Clermont, declares that messages of necessity are in the majority of cases not used in times of true emergency, and are therefore used frivolously and in contravention to the spirit of the New York State Constitution; and

RESOLVED, That this legislative body calls upon Governor Cuomo and his successors to only issue messages of necessity in times of true emergency; and calls upon the New York State Senate and Assembly to reject messages of necessity unless there is truly an emergency, and in such cases place a brief sunset provision on the bill in question so that a full debate can be held when the emergency is past; and

RESOLVED, That the Clerk of this Legislative Body is hereby directed to transmit certified copies of this resolution to U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, U.S. Representative Chris Gibson, Governor Andrew Cuomo, State Senator Kathy Marchione, and Assemblywoman Didi Barrett.

 

 

 

REFERENCE INFORMATION ON STATISTICS IN RESOLUTION

1915 convention proposed an outright ban on messages of necessity

“Amendments to the State Constitution presented by the New York State federation of labor”, bullet 18, http://archive.org/stream/cu31924009908611#page/n321/mode/2up

“Address to the People of the State of New York”, Doc. No. 54, page 6, http://archive.org/stream/cu31924009908611#page/n737/mode/2up/search/emergency

1938 convention amended the constitution to require the Governor to certify the facts of the emergency

New York State Constitution, Article III §14, http://www.dos.ny.gov/info/constitution.htm

Maybee v. State of N.Y., 828 NE 2d 975 (N.Y. Ct. of Appeals 2005) citing 2 Revised Rec, 1938 NY Constitutional Convention, at 1435

Messages of necessity have been used over 1,200 times since 1995, including 29 times by Governor Cuomo in 2011, 23 times by governor Spitzer in 2007, and 34 times by Governor Pataki in 2005

http://effectiveny.org/fast-fact/message-necessity-immediate-vote/click-see-all-uses-1995

http://effectiveny.org/fast-fact/message-necessity-immediate-vote/cuomo-has-used-message-necessity-29-times-2011-spitzer-us

Messages of necessity have been used to pass controversial legislation such as the Redistricting Statute, the Tier VI Pensions, DNA Database, Teacher Evaluations, and Same Sex Marriage

http://effectiveny.org/issue/Message-of-Necessity-for-Immediate-Vote

 

Orleans County Calls for Repeal of the SAFE Act

The Orleans County Legislature unanimously passed it’s second resolution against the SAFE Act at it’s meeting on April 24th. The board originally passed a resolution on February 13th against certain provisions of the SAFE Act. This resolution, “calls for reconsideration and repeal of the so called NY SAFE Act of 2013.”

 ORLEANS COUNTY LEGISLATURE ALBION, NEW YORK

RESOLUTION NO. 173-413

ORLEANS COUNTY LEGISLATURE CALLS FOR REPEAL OF THE “NEW YORK SAFE ACT”

WHEREAS, the New York State Legislature enacted and Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (NY SAFE ACT); and

WHEREAS, this legislation is viewed by many citizens of the State of New York as being extremely controversial as those citizens view this Legislation as infringing upon their rights guaranteed to them under the second Amendment of the United State Constitution; and

WHEREAS, each and every issue that comes before the New York State Legislature before an enactment deserves a fair and open discussion which incorporates all points of views in order to ensure that all citizens are heard and that the Legislation incorporates the various points of view expressed during that discussion and benefits all of the citizens of the State of New York; and

WHEREAS, the NY SAFE ACT was adopted after minimal public discussion, contains serious flaws, i.e., police officers are not exempt, and having been on the desks of the members of the New York State Legislature for only a few hours, thereafter was literally adopted in the night and signed into law by Governor Andrew Cuomo; and

WHEREAS, the Governor has pledged to inflict no new unfunded mandates on local governments yet the Act contains no provision for funding the additional duties being imposed upon local Mental Health Departments, County Clerks, or local law enforcement agencies and as such constitutes yet another unfunded mandate by the State upon local municipal government with no corresponding revenue; and

WHEREAS, the Orleans County Legislature, by passage of Resolution No. 82-213, opposed the process of enactment and certain provisions contained within the New York Safe Act; and

WHEREAS, it is believed that many Orleans County residents are deeply concerned with this legislation, its effects, and the undue haste with which it was enacted; be it

RESOLVED, that the Orleans County Legislature calls for reconsideration and repeal of the so called NY SAFE ACT of 2013; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies be sent to New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator George Maziarz, Assembly members Steve Hawley and Jane Corwin, NYSAC, Orleans County Towns and Villages, and all others deemed necessary and appropriate.

Moved, Allport; second, Johnson.

Adopted. 6 ayes; 0 nays; 1 absent, Bower. ORLEANS COUNTY LEGISLATURE ALBION, NEW YORK

RESOLUTION NO. 173-413

-page 2-

COUNTY OF ORLEANS

STATE OF NEW YORK

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct transcript of a resolution duly adopted by the Orleans County Legislature on the 24th day of April, 2013.

Dated at Albion, New York

April 25, 2013

Nadine P. Hanlon, Clerk

Orleans County Legislature

County of Orleans, New York

Resolution Passed in Town of Hartland

The Hartland Town Board unanimously passed a resolution against the SAFE Act on February 14th, 2013. The Board states in the resolution, “the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms for defense of Life, liberty, and Property is regarded as an inalienable right by the People of the Town of Hartland, Niagara County, New York.”

Town of Hartland #149
14 Feb 2013
http://townofhartland.org/content/MinuteCategories/View/21:field=minutes;/content/Minutes/View/21
February 14, 2013

 

The regular meeting of the Town of Hartland, County of Niagara, State of New York, was held on the above date at the Town Hall, 8942 Ridge Road, Gasport convening at 7:30 p.m.
Members present:
Supervisor:                                          W. Ross Annable
Councilman:                                        F. David Snyder
                                                            Daniel Hill
                                                            Joseph Reed
                                                            Brian Gross
Attorney:                                             Daniel Seaman
Hwy. /Water Sup’t.                             Keith Hurtgam
Hwy. Admin. Asst.:                            Janet Slack
Attended by:                                       Sign in sheet attached
Supervisor Annable called the meeting to order with all present standing for the pledge to the flag.
Repeal of SAFE Gun Law
RESOLUTION 51-2013
WHEREAS,  the right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms is guaranteed as an Individual Right under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and under the Constitution of the State of New York, and
WHEREAS,  the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms for defense of Life, liberty, and Property is regarded as an inalienable right by the People of the Town of Hartland, Niagara County, New York, and
WHEREAS, the Hartland Town Board, being elected to represent the People of Hartland and being duly sworn by their Oath of Office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York and,
WHEREAS, legislation passed by the New York State Assembly and Senate infringes on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and would ban the possession and use of firearms now employed by individual citizens of the Town of Hartland, for defense of Life, Liberty and Property and would ban the possession and use of firearms now employed for safe forms of firearms recreation, hunting, and shooting conducted within the Town of Hartland, Niagara County, New York.
WHEREAS, the Hartland Town Board believes there are many other less intrusive means available, other than rash, confusing and inarticulately drafted firearms laws that would effectively control, manage, and reduce violence in our society, such as, mental health reforms, anti-bullying programs for schools, enforcement of existing firearms laws to the fullest extent possible, and proper psychological counseling for those in need or who request it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the Hartland Town Board does hereby oppose the enactment of any legislation that would infringe upon the Right of the People to keep and bear arms and consider such laws to be unnecessary and beyond lawful legislative authority granted to our State representative, as there is no documented correlation between gun control measures and crime reduction.
-8-
February 14, 2013
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be sent to  President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand,
Congressman Chris Collins, Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator George Maziarz, Assemblywoman Jane Corwin, and Assemblyman John Ceretto.
MOTION by Supervisor W. Ross Annable, seconded by Councilman Joseph A. Reed to approve the resolution, opposing the enactment of the SAFE gun control law issued by Governor Andrew Cuomo
Ayes:   5          Nays:   0          ADOPTED

Town of Lewiston Passes Resolution

On February 25th, the Lewiston Town Board unanimously passed a resolution in opposition to the NY SAFE Act. Board member Earnest C. Palmer asked, “How sad is it when a Town Board has to pass a resolution to support our Constitution?”

************************************** Tim Masters, Building Inspector provided a Resolution requesting the Board support.

Clerk read resolution into record.

RESOLUTION #4 OF 2013

Resolution in Support of the Second Amendment

WHEREAS, the right of the people to keep and bear arms is guaranteed as an individual right under the second amendment to the United States Constitution and under the Constitution of the State of New York and

WHEREAS, the right of the people to keep and bear arms for defense of life, liberty and property is regarded as an inalienable right by the people of the Town of Lewiston, Lewiston, New York and

WHEREAS, the people of the Town of Lewiston, Lewiston, New York, derive economic benefit from all safe forms of firearms recreation, hunting, and shooting conducted within Lewiston using all types of firearms allowable under the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York and

WHEREAS, the Town of Lewiston Town Board being elected to represent the people of Lewiston and being duly sworn by their Oath of Office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York and

WHEREAS, the New York State Assembly and the New York State Senate being elected by the people of the State of New York and being duly sworn by their Oath of Office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York and

WHEREAS, legislation passed by the New York Assembly and Senate infringes on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and would ban the possession and use of firearms now employed by individual citizens of the Town of Lewiston for defense of life, liberty and property and would ban the possession and use of firearms now employed for safe forms of firearms recreation, hunting and shooting conducted within the Town of Lewiston, Lewiston, New York.

WHEREAS, the Town of Lewiston Town Board believes there are many other less intrusive means available other than rash, confusing and inarticulately drafted firearms laws that would effectively control, manage and reduce violence in our society such as mental health reforms, anti-bullying programs for schools, enforcement of existing firearms laws to the fullest extent possible and proper psychological counseling for those in need or who request it.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT BE AND IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Town of Lewiston Town Board does hereby oppose the enactment of any legislation that would infringe upon the Right of the People to keep and bear arms and consider such laws to be unnecessary and beyond lawful legislative authority granted to our State representatives, as there is no documented correlation between gun control measures and crime reduction.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be sent to President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Congressman Chris Collins, Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator George Maziarz and Assemblyman John Ceretto.

Marra complemented the growing number of Counties that have passed similar resolutions. This was rushed through with no public comments allowed. There is usually a three-day debate between the Senate and the Assembly. The Assembly was given 50-minutes to look at and pass. When it involves the Bill of Rights it should have been put out for discussion. It certainly does nothing it claims to do. It has been said that this law would have had no effect on the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut or Aurora, Colorado. These are mental health reform and those items are necessary.

Marra MOVED to approve Resolution #4 – 2013 and forward to those listed, Seconded by Winkley

 Palmer asks “How sad is it when a Town Board has to pass a resolution to support our Constitution?”

Carried 4 – 0

 

Broome County resolution calling for repeal of the SAFE act

Broome County Safe Resolution by Evan Hempel

Dutchess County Pistol Association letter to Cuomo requesting repeal of SAFE act

DCPA Safe Act by Evan Hempel

Albany Police Officers Union, local 2841, Council 82, AFSCME, AFI-CIO

FROM: Albany Police Officers Union, local 2841, Council 82, AFSCME, AFI-CIO, P.O BOX 6567, ALBANY, NEW YORK 12206 (518) 438-9422

To: Andrew M. Cuomo / Dean G. Skelos / Neil D. Breslin / John T- McDonald III / Phil Steck / Sheldon Silver / Jeffrey D. Klein / Cecilia Tkaczyk / Patricia Fahy

Note; see the formal list of people this letter went to at the bottom.

April 15,2013

Honorable Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Albany Police Officers Union condemns and opposes the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act (the SAFE Act).  Substantively, we believe that it violates fundamental constitutional rights, that it is unduly and purposely burdensome on law-abiding citizens, and” that it will not deter criminals or menially ill individuals from plotting and carrying out bloodshed and violence. Procedurally, we believe that the way in which the bill was rammed into law via an unjustified and expedient “message of necessity”, which circumvents the right and the ability of the citizens of this State to voice their concerns about the bill and have them addressed, is an outrage. This flawed law and the way in which it was rushed and passed, shows the apparent contempt that those who govern have for the governed, and calls into question whether we truly have a representational government. Morally, we believe that this law is about ideology and politics and not about making anyone any safer. We respectfully demand that you do the right thing and repeal the law.

First, while we applaud and support your overall concern for public safety and your desire to improve it. The SAFE Act will not improve public safety. Criminals and the mentally ill will not abide by it, and it is either foolish or dishonest to think or suggest otherwise. While law-abiding citizens will abide by the law and not load a ten-round magazine with more than seven rounds, do you really expect a criminal or mentally ill individual intent on doing violence not load ten rounds into a ten-round magazine? While law-abiding citizens will abide by the law that previously legal thirty-round magazines must be sold within one-year to an out-of-state resident or turn in to local authorities, do you really expect a criminal or mentally ill individual intent on doing violence to sell or turn in his thirty-round magazines? While law-abiding citizens will abide by the law requiring that they register weapons which they already do and which have been deemed “assault weapons”, do you really expect a criminal or mentally ill individual intent on doing violence to do so? Do you really expect a criminal or mentally ill individual intent on doing violence to be concerned about any increase in penalties for shooting first responders? Do you really expect that a mentally ill individual who owns firearms and who is intent on doing violence will voice his intentions to his or her mental health professional and thus put into motion the confiscation of his or her firearms? Do you really expect that a mentally ill individual will “safely store” his firearms? Of course you don’t. Again, only law-abiding citizens, who are not intent on doing violence, will abide the NY SAFE Act criminals and the mentally ill who are intent on doing violence will not do so. The public will not be any safer under this 1aw. What then, have you accomplished?

Second, the SAFE Act carries with it unfair burdens on law abiding citizen. What is the point of making law-abiding citizens register their previously lawfully owned and lawfully used firearms which are now deemed to be “assault weapons”? What is the point of making law-abiding citizens who affirmatively “opt into” protection from public identification that they hold permits or own firearms? What is the point of making law-abiding citizens renew their pistol permits or “assault weapon” registrations every five years? Why are you preemptively punishing those who have done nothing wrong?

Third, we fully believe that the SAFE ACT broad prohibitions against will not withstand constitutional challenge and scrutiny. The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides and U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the right of individuals to possess and carry firearms and to use them for lawful purposes. The SAFE Act, however, infringes on that right as it bans the possession and use of certain firearms that were heretofore possessed and” used lawfully for the defense of life, liberty, and property, and as it bans the possession and use of certain firearms that were heretofore possessed and used lawfully for safe use of firearms recreation, hunting, and shooting.

We as police officers are on the front lines of public safety. Respectfully, none of you are. We see, feel, work, and live with the effects of gun violence in ways that you cannot. We believe that you see gun violence as a means to move your agenda and your ambitions forward. You know that the SAFE Act will not work in the way that you pretend it will. You know that this shameful SAFE Act was about ideology and politics and not about making anyone safer.

Regarding the reduction in violent crime this new legislation is proposed to have, in 2011 the most current year for which FBI crime statistics are available, New York State had 77l homicides, 445 were committed with a firearm, 394 of that 445 were committed with a handgun, 5 were committed with a rifle, 16 were committed with a shotgun, in 30 the firearm type was unknown, 160 were committed with a cutting instrument, 143 were committed with another type of weapon, and 26 were committed with bare hands. We believe based on these statistics, that the SAFE Act will do nothing to reduce violent crime as the primary target of the legislation is the “assault rifle” which would be included statistically with standard rifles and used in less than 1% of New York homicides in 2011. These so called “Assault Weapons” were not used in the commission of one reported crime in Albany County in 2011.

For the reasons set forth above, the Albany Police Union believes that the SAFE Act is wrong – substantively, procedurally, and morally. The SAFE Act infringes on the rights of law-abiding citizens, it will burden and negatively impact firearms ownership by law-abiding citizens and will not affect the willingness of criminals or those who are mentally ill from perpetrating violence. Again, we respectfully demand that each and all of you do the right thing and repeal the law.

Very truly yours,

Thomas Mahar
President
Albany Police Officers Union, local 2841
Council 82, AFSCME, AFI-CIO

 

The Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor of New York State
New, York State Capitol
Albany, New York 12224

The Honorable Dean G. Skelos
Temporary President
New York State Senate
Legislative Office Building, Room 909
Albany, New York 12247

The Honorable Neil D. Breslin
New York State Senator
172 State Street Room 414, Capitol
Albany, New York 12247

The Honorable John T- McDonald III
New York State Assemblyman
Legislative Office Building, Room 913
Albany, New York 12248

The Honorable Phil Steck
New York State Assemblyman
Legislative Office Building, Room 819
Albany, New York 12248

The Honorable Sheldon Silver
Speaker, New York State Assembly
Legislative Office Building. Room 913
Albany, New York 12248

The Honorable Jeffrey D. Klein
Temporary President
New York State Senate
Legislative Office Building, Room 913
Albany, New York 12247

The Honorable Cecilia Tkaczyk
New York State Senator
Legislative Office Building, Room 311
Albany, New York 12247

The Honorable Patricia Fahy
New York State Assemblywoman
Legislative Office Building, Room 458
Albany, New York 12248

SAFE Act Opposition letter in PDF format

Town of Poestenkill resolution opposing the SAFE Act

Town of Poestenkill by Nathan Hempel