Tag Archives: Passed

Orleans County resolution opposing the NY SAFE Act

The following resolution was passed by the Orleans County Legislature on February 13, 2013

RESOLUTION NO. 82-213

OPPOSING THE PROCESS OF ENACTMENT AND CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE NEW YORK SAFE ACT

WHEREAS, the right of the people to keep and bear arms is guaranteed as an individual right under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution; and

WHEREAS, the right of the people to keep and bear arms for defense of life, liberty, and property is regarded as an inalienable right by the people of Orleans County; and

WHEREAS, the lawful ownership of firearms is, and has been, a valued tradition in Orleans County, and the rights protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution are exercised by many of our residents; and

WHEREAS, the people of Orleans County derive economic and environmental benefits from all safe forms of recreation involving firearms, including, but not limited to, hunting and target shooting while utilizing all types of firearms available under the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, members of the Orleans County Legislature, being elected to represent the people of Orleans County, are duly sworn by their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, members of the New York State Assembly and the New York State Senate, being elected by the people of New York State, are duly sworn by their oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the enactment of the NY SAFE Act (Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2013) has engendered significant controversy over both the process by which it was enacted and certain provisions contained within it; and

WHEREAS, it is our understanding that many State Legislators had less than an hour to read the legislation, which contained approximately twenty-five thousand words, before being forced to vote on it; and

WHEREAS, having reviewed the legislation and time constraints, it is our conclusion that there is no possible way any individual could have read the entire bill and understood its full implications prior to voting on it; and

WHEREAS, our State Legislators most certainly could not have had the time to request, and receive, the input of their constituents regarding this matter; and

WHEREAS, seeking and considering, such public input is a standard to which we hold ourselves in the Orleans County Legislature; and

WHEREAS, this legislation has 60 sections, of which only three take effect immediately; and

WHEREAS, in our opinion, there was no reason for the Governor to use a message of necessity to bring this bill to vote immediately and bypass the three day maturing process for all legislation; and

WHEREAS, the mishandling of the process in crafting the NY SAFE Act resulted in complex policy changes, many of which have been left up to interpretation, and are confusing even to the State Legislators who voted on them, and the law enforcement officials who are required to enforce and explain them; and

WHEREAS, requiring law-abiding gun owners to verify ownership of certain types of firearms every five years, in addition to registering them on their permits, which now also must be renewed every 5 years, does not increase the safety of the public and is unnecessarily burdensome to the residents of New York State; and

WHEREAS, there will be a significant financial impact due to the approximately 5,300 Orleans County permits that will have to be renewed requiring additional manpower and computer systems; and

WHEREAS, this legislation prohibits the sale of firearm magazines with a capacity larger than seven rounds; and

WHEREAS, those firearm magazines with a capacity larger than seven rounds, which are authorized to be retained by existing owners, may only be loaded with seven rounds and eventually must be permanently altered to only accept seven rounds or be disposed of, thus constituting a seizure of legally owned personal property with no provision for compensation; and

WHEREAS, few or no low capacity (7 rounds or less) magazines currently exist for many of the firearms commonly possessed by law-abiding residents of New York State; and

WHEREAS, limiting the number of rounds to seven versus ten is arbitrary and capricious, has no correlation to public safety, unfairly burdens law-abiding gun owners, and puts an undue burden on gun manufacturers to retool their manufacturing plants; and

WHEREAS, the only persons who will comply with the new high-capacity magazine ban are law-abiding citizens, leaving the same high-capacity magazines in the hands of those who choose not to obey the law; and

WHEREAS, requiring documentation of all ammunition sales in New York State, as provided for in this legislation, is a significant unfunded mandate on business; and

WHEREAS, the New York State Combined Ballistic Identification System, which wasted $44 million in taxpayer money and resulted in zero convictions, illustrates the propensity of government to waste taxpayer resources when legislation is not properly reviewed; and

WHEREAS, Governor Cuomo has proposed spending $36 million dollars in his 2013-2014 Executive budget for the implementation of the NY SAFE Act at a time when New York State residents are crying out for tax relief; and

WHEREAS, this legislation severely impacts the possession and use of firearms now employed by the residents of Orleans County for defense of life, liberty, and property; and

WHEREAS, this legislation severely impacts the possession and use of firearms now employed for safe forms of recreation including, but not limited to, hunting and target shooting; and

WHEREAS, while there are some areas of the legislation that the Orleans County Legislature finds encouraging, such as addressing glaring shortcomings in the mental health system, the strengthening of Kendra’s Law and Mark’s law, as well as privacy protections for certain pistol permit holders, by-and-large, we find the legislation does little more than negatively impact lawful gun ownership; and

WHEREAS, this legislation fails to offer any meaningful solutions to gun violence and places increased burdens where they do not belong, squarely on the backs of law-abiding citizens; and

WHEREAS, this legislation effectively turns countless New York State law-abiding gun owners into criminals; and

WHEREAS, the manner in which this legislation was brought forward for vote in the State Legislature is deeply disturbing to the Orleans County Legislature; now, therefore be it

RESOLVED, that the Orleans County Legislature does hereby oppose, and request the repeal of, any legislation, including the sections within the NY SAFE Act (Chapter1 of the Laws of 2013), which infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Orleans County Legislature considers such laws to be unnecessary and beyond lawful legislative authority granted to our State representatives; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Orleans County Legislature strongly encourages members of the New York State Legislature to hold public hearings to address the issue of gun violence in a way that will produce meaningful results; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Orleans County Legislature requests the members of the New York State Senate and Assembly who represent all, or part of, Orleans County to reply, in writing, with their views on, and actions taken, in support of, or opposition to, the NY SAFE Act; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to President Barack Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senator Charles Schumer, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Congressman Chris Collins, New York State Senator George Maziarz, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, New York State Assembly members Steve Hawley and Jane Corwin, NYSAC, InterCounty of Western New York and all other deemed necessary and proper.

Moved, Johnson; second, Unanimous.

Adopted.  6 ayes; 0 nays;1 absent, Allport.

Town of Neversink resolution supporting the second amendment

Passed February 13th.

Town of Neversink February Agenda by Evan Hempel

Town of Benson resolution opposing the SAFE Act

RESOLUTION 41-13

RESOLUTION TO PROTECT OUR 2nd AMENDMENT RIGHTS

By Councilman John M. Stortecky

Town of Benson

Dated: February 13, 2013

WHEREAS, the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution as ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State, reads: “ A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”, and

WHEREAS, Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a gun-control law passed by the New York State Senate and the Assembly, which was formulated and passed under the cover of darkness and without debate, which he had pushed through after allowing only 20 minutes to 2 hours to be read before a vote was taken. He
clearly pushed the bill to passage to boost his own political career, saying  “Common sense can win. You can overpower the extremists with intelligence and with reason and with common sense.”, and

WHEREAS, this vote was taken and passed in the same way as Obamacare and absolutely lacking in common sense, as Fulton County Sheriff said “I am appalled. The Legislature has back-doored the American people and walked all over the Constitution of the United States.”, and

WHEREAS, the Governor presented his case for magazine limits by shrieking out his misguided views in the tradition of Hillary Clinton and Howard Dean and embarrassing himself and our State in front of the Nation, and

WHEREAS, an editorial in the Leader-Herald newspaper stated “The limitation of weapons magazines to seven rounds-three rounds below the federal limit-seems like nonsense. What makes seven the magic number?”, and

WHEREAS, Senator Greg Ball said “We haven’t saved any lives tonight, except one: the political life of a governor who wants to be president. We have taken an entire category of firearms that are currently legal that are in the homes of law-abiding, tax paying citizens. We are now turning those law-abiding citizens into criminals.”, and

WHEREAS, Senator Hugh Farley and Assemblyman Marc Butler strongly oppose the gun-control law, and Assemblyman Butler wrote a column in which he said “I am flabbergasted at how the 2013 legislation session began. The principles of transparency and good government were turned on their heads on
January 14 and 15, when Gov. Andrew Cuomo pushed his dangerously flawed gun-control bill through the Legislature with a message of necessity. His bold move shut down the voices of millions-those who believe in their Second Amendment rights-but more importantly, their right to participate in
government. I worry that this ‘my way or the highway’ attitude from Cuomo will be a detriment to upstate New York”, and 52 New York State Sheriffs have sent a letter to the Governor, which in part reads “There are a number of provisions in the law which our Association finds to be helpful to law enforcement and to our citizens. Those are pointed out in our position statement. There are also a
number of provisions which cause us concern, and which we think should be revisited. Those we also point out in the position statement.”, and

WHEREAS, Cal Thomas has written “The latest effort to ‘control’ guns in America is as likely to deter someone intent on breaking the law as outlawing lust would affect one’s libido. What’s in a heart can’t be controlled by restricting what’s in a hand.” He also writes “You know rational thinking is lacking when Pravda, Russia’s communist political newspaper, makes sense. In a recent article, Stanislav Mishin writes that after the Bolsheviks seized Moscow in 1917, they promised to leave alone the well-armed citizens if they did not interfere.” They did not interfere, and for that they were asked afterwards “to come register themselves and their weapons, whereupon they were promptly shot.” Mr. Thomas continues “The Second Amendment was written to protect citizens from tyrannical government and to preserve our liberties. It’s not primarily for the protection of hunters and target shooters, though they are included. Those politicians who wish to ignore the Constitution are the ones who need to be
controlled, not law-abiding gun owners.”, and

WHEREAS, Thomas Sowell writes “If, as gun control advocates claim, gun control laws really do control guns and save lives, there is nothing to prevent repealing the Second Amendment, any more than there was anything to prevent repealing the Eighteenth Amendment that created Prohibition. But, if the hard
facts show that gun control laws do not actually control guns, but instead lead to more armed robberies and higher murder rates after law-abiding citizens are disarmed, then gun control laws would be a bad idea, even if there were no Second Amendment and no National Rifle Association.” He continues, saying
“One can cherry-pick the factual studies , or cite some studies that have subsequently been discredited, but the great bulk of the studies show that gun control laws do not in fact control guns. On net balance, they do not save lives but cost lives.”, and

WHEREAS, Charles C.W. Cooke writes the National Review magazine “It makes little philosophical sense for the elected representatives of a government that is subordinate to the people to be able to disarm those people. An enlightened state may not remove from the people the basic rights that are recognized in the very document to which it owes its existence. To ask, ‘Why do you need an AR-15?’ is
to invert the relationship. A better question: ‘Why don’t you want me to have one?’” Therefore, be it

RESOLVED, that the Town Board, Town of Benson, respectfully requests that each member of the Hamilton County Board of Supervisors do everything within their power to protect and defend the 2nd Amendment rights of all the citizens of Hamilton County, and in doing so protect their own rights and
the rights of all Americans, as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. We ask that you remember the words of Benjamin Franklin, who said “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”, and finally, Thomas Jefferson:

“It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.”

Motion to adopt Resolution #41-13 as drafted:   Shepard

Seconded: Gregor

Ayes: Shepard, Gregor, Stortecky

Nays: Cox

Absent: Pincombe

Town of Holland resolution opposing the SAFE Act

Town of Holland resolution opposing the SAFE Act passed unanimously.

Town of Holland, NY Resolution to Suspend NY SAFE Act

WHEREAS  The Town of Holland is a rural community with a large percentage of hunters, sportsmen, and supporters of the second amendment, and

WHEREAS  On Monday, January 14, 2013 the rights under the second Amendment of our Constitution was infringed on without due process, and

WHEREAS  The Gun Control Bill (S.2230) known as NY SAFE Act was rushed through the Senate and Assembly without a single public hearing or any input from various law enforcement agencies located around the state, and

WHEREAS  State lawmakers did not have time to review the bill as presented, leaving many questions about implementation and regulation of this new law, and

WHEREAS  This law should focus on increasing penalties for criminals who use firearms to threaten or harm law abiding citizens, and should address the issue of mental illness as it relates to violence, and

WHEREAS  The Town of Holland realizes that the NY SAFE Act gun control law must be repealed and that the restrictive parts of the enacted law be replaced, and

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Holland urgently requests Governor Andrew Cuomo and the legislative leaders to immediately suspend this law and to have an open and informed discussion on gun control that will address the real issues that would strengthen public safety, but not infringe upon the constitutional rights of responsible, law abiding New York State residents.

RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to: Honorable Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Honorable Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, Honorable Majority Leader of Independent Democratic Caucus Jeff Klein, Honorable Senate Minority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, Honorable Speaker of the Assembly Sheldon Silver, Honorable Leader of the Assembly Joseph Morelle, Honorable Minority Leader of the Assembly Brian Kolb, and the Western New York Delegation and Erie County Legislators.

ALL AYES. CARRIED.

Oneida County resolution opposing NY SAFE act.

Resolution passed February 13th.  See page 26

Oneida County Adopted Resolution 021313 by Evan Hempel

Livingston County resolution opposing NY SAFE act.

6. CALLING FOR THE REPEAL OF THE NEW YORK SAFE ACT OF 2013

WHEREAS, the New York State Legislature recently enacted and Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law The New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (“NY SAFE ACT”); and

WHEREAS, the State of New York has a tradition and long history of conducting its deliberations and debates in the public view and that in the enactment of the NY SAFE ACT the New York State Legislature and Governor Andrew Cuomo acted in contradiction of this long, time honored tradition of an open government; and

WHEREAS, this legislation imposes far more burdensome regulations upon law abiding gun owners; notably;

1. The law’s definition of assault weapons is too broad, and prevents the possession of many weapons that are legitimately used for hunting, target shooting and self defense;

2. The law enacts reductions in the maximum capacity of gun magazines which unfairly limits the designcapabilities of guns purchased legally for over a century;

3. The law requires a five year recertification of pistol permits and registration of existing assault weapons which is an unfair impediment; and

WHEREAS, this legislation creates an environment in the state hostile to gun manufacturers and gun ownership; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, that the Livingston County Board of Supervisors calls for the repeal of the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (“NY SAFE ACT”); and, be it further

RESOLVED, that certified copies of this resolution be forwarded to Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senators Catharine M. Young and Patrick M. Gallivan and Assemblyman Bill Nojay, and the New York State Association of Counties. Dated at Geneseo, New York February 13, 2013 Ways and Means Committee

Livingston County Resolution

Livingston County Board Agenda by Evan Hempel

Rensselaer County resolution opposing NY SAFE act

Passed February 12th

Rensselaer County Meeting Packet 2-12-13 Resolution is P/68/13 on page 27.

Rensselaer County Meeting Packet 2-12-13 by Evan Hempel

Town of Inlet resolution against the SAFE Act

Town of Inlet resolution in support of the New York State Sheriff’s Association’s position on the SAFE Act passed unanimously.

Supervisor Frey would like to support the New York State Sheriffs; Association position on Governor Cuomo’s New York Safe Act by passing the following;

RESOLUTION NO. 15.13 SAFE ACT SUPPORT

On a motion offered by Supervisor Frey, the following resolution was ADOPTED by VOTE;

WHEREAS, the right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, as well as the Civil Rights Law of the State of New York, and

WHEREAS, Sheriffs represent all the people and they take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York, and

WHEREAS, Sheriffs enforce all laws of the state and will protect the rights of all citizens, including those rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York, and

WHEREAS, Sheriff Karl G. Abrams attended the New York State Sheriffs’ Association Winter Conference on January 22, 2013 to January 24, 2013 in which 52 of 58 New York State’s Sheriffs were present and discussed Governor Cuomo’s SAFE Act, and

WHEREAS, Sheriff Karl G. Abrams and other members of the New York State Sheriffs’ Association identified the following six provisions of the new law, which they believe are helpful and will increase the safety of our citizens, and

WHEREAS, the six provisions are as follows:

1. Restriction on FOIL requests about pistol permit holders. By granting citizens the option of having their names and addresses withheld from public disclosure, the new law does provide a mechanism to allow people to decide for themselves whether their personal information should be accessible to the public. We believe, however, that no one should have to explain why their personal information should remain confidential. A better procedure, we believe, is simply to exempt all this personal information from FOIL disclosure.

2. Killing of emergency first responders. The new law makes killing of emergency first responders aggravated or first-degree murder, enhancing penalties for this crime and requiring life without parole. First responders need this protection, evidenced all too often by attacks on them when they attempt to provide help, and in special recognition of the terrible attacks on two firefighters in Webster, NY and attacks on first responders in Jefferson County.

3. Requirement of NICS checks for private sales (except between immediate family). We believe that this will ensure that responsible citizens will still be able to obtain legal firearms through private transactions, with the added assurance that the federal National Instant Criminal Background Check System approves
private buyers. We remain concerned that this provision will be very difficult to enforce and will likely only affect law-abiding citizens.

4. Comprehensive review of mental health records before firearms permits are granted and review of records to determine if revocation of permits is required. Sheriffs believe that there is an urgent need to increase funding for mental health care. The new law imposes reporting requirements on many mental health care professionals and others who may make a determination that a person is a danger to himself or others. The law further gives needed authority to courts or others who issue firearm permits to deny permit applications or to revoke permits already issued. We believe that this issue demands a much more full and detailed discussion about how to keep guns out of the hands of such people. The Sheriffs of New York want to pursue these issues with the Governor and the State Legislature.

5. Safe storage of firearms. The new law provides that guns must be safely stored if the owner lives with someone who has been convicted of a felony or domestic violence crime, has been involuntarily committed, or is currently under an order of protection. We agree that firearms owners should have the responsibility to make sure that their weapons are safeguarded against use or access by prohibited persons, and the new law adds these protections to ensure that weapons are safely and securely stored.

6. Increased penalties for illegal use of weapons. The new law adds several increased sanctions for violation of New York gun laws and creates new gun crimes, which did not previously exist. These new provisions will provide added tools for law enforcement to prosecute such crimes. We further believe that
the new provisions should help deter future misuse of firearms. We also suggest that the legislature consider limitations on plea-bargaining for all gun crimes. and

WHEREAS, Sheriff Karl G. Abrams and other members of the New York State Sheriffs’ Association reviewed other provisions of the new law, and strongly believe that many modifications are needed to clarify the intent of some of these new provisions and that revisions are needed to allow Sheriffs to properly enforce the law in their county, and

WHEREAS, the modifications are as follows:

1. Assault weapon ban and definition of assault weapons. We believe that the new definition of assault weapons is too broad, and prevents the possession of many weapons that are legitimately used for hunting, target shooting and self-defense. Classifying firearms as assault weapons because of one arbitrary feature effectively deprives people the right to possess firearms, which have never before been designated as assault weapons. We are convinced that these new provisions will affect only law abiding gun owners, while criminals will still have and use
whatever weapons they want.

2. Inspection of schools by state agencies. The new law transfers to state agencies the responsibility to review school safety plans. We expect that funding will be transferred to these state agencies to implement safety proposals. Sheriffs and local police provide this service in all parts of the state and can perform these duties efficiently. As the chief law enforcement officer of the county, Sheriffs are in the best position to know the security needs of schools in their own counties, and the state should help to fund these existing efforts by Sheriffs and local police departments to keep our schools safe. Because Sheriffs and local police are
already deeply involved with school safety plans, have developed emergency response plans, and are familiar with structural layouts of schools in their counties, they should be included along with state counterparts in any effort to review school safety plans.

3. Reduction of ammunition magazine capacity. The new law enacts reductions in the maximum capacity of gun magazines. We believe based on our years of law enforcement experience that this will not reduce gun violence. The new law will unfairly limit the ability of law-abiding citizens to purchase firearms in New York. It bears repeating that it is our belief that the reduction of magazine capacity will not make New Yorkers or our communities safer.

4. Five year recertification of pistol permit status and registration of existing assault weapons. The new law delegates to the State Police the duty to solicit and receive updated personal information of permit holders every five years in order to maintain these permits. Further, the law requires owners of certain existing
firearms now classified as assault weapons to register these with the State Police within one year. The recertification and registration conflict with Sheriffs’ duties regarding issuance of pistol permits. All records should be maintained at the local, and not the state level. This information should be accessible to those who are responsible for initial investigation of permit applications. Pistol permit information should be maintained in one file at the local level, and forwarded to a statewide database for law enforcement use. It bears repeating that it is our belief that pistol permit and any registration information required by the law should be confidential and protected from FOIL disclosure.

5. Sale of ammunition. The new law imposes several new provisions regarding how and from whom ammunition can be lawfully purchased. The law should be clarified about the use of the Internet as a vehicle for these sales, out of state sales to New York residents, and other issues. Businesses have said that they do not understand the new provisions and are concerned that they will have to cease operations.

6. Law enforcement exemptions must be clarified. The new law has many provisions that might apply to law enforcement officers and there has been much confusion about whether existing law enforcement exemptions continue to apply. We understand that the Governor and Legislature have already agreed to review and modify these provisions where necessary, and the Sheriffs want to be part of the discussion to make the changes effective.  Additionally, the exemptions should apply to retired police and peace officers and to others in the employ of the Sheriff and other police agencies that perform security duties at public facilities and events.

7. Method of bill passage. It is the view of the Sheriffs’ Association that anytime government decides it is necessary or desirable to test the boundaries of a constitutional right that it should only be done with caution and with great respect for those constitutional boundaries. Further, it should only be done if the
benefit to be gained is so great and certain that it far outweighs the damage done by the constriction of individual liberty. While many of the provisions of the new law have surface appeal, it is far from certain that all, or even many, of them will have any significant effect in reducing gun violence, which is the presumed goal of all of us. Unfortunately the process used in adoption of this act did not permit the mature development of the arguments on either side of the debate, and thus many of the stakeholders in this important issue are left feeling ignored by their
government. Even those thrilled with the passage of this legislation should be concerned about the process used to secure its passage, for the next time they may find themselves the victim of that same process.  Fortunately, the Governor has shown himself open to working with interested parties to address some of the problems that arose due to the hasty enactment of this law. We will work with the Governor and the Legislature on these issues and

WHEREAS, Inlet Town Supervisor John Frey along with Inlet Police Chief Andrew Kalil are asking for the Inlet Town Board to support the New York State Sheriffs’ Association’s Position to Governor Cuomo’s NY SAFE Act, be it

RESOLVED, that The Town Board of Inlet NY supports the New York State Sheriffs’ Association’s Position to Governor Cuomo’s NY SAFE Act, and be it further

RESOLVED, that certified copies of this Resolution be forwarded to the Governor of the State of New York Andrew M. Cuomo, Senator Hugh T. Farley, Assemblyman Marc Butler, New York State Association of Counties and the New York State Sheriffs’ Association. Seconded by All, Councilman Schmid, Councilman Brownsell, Councilman Faro, Councilman Levi, Supervisor Frey

5 AYES

0 NAYS

Motion carried

Madison County resolution opposing NY SAFE act

Passed February 12th

Madison County Meeting Minutes – February 12 2013 by Evan Hempel

Tioga County resolution opposing NY SAFE act

RESOLUTION NO. 45-13 RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE PROCESS OF ENACTMENT AND CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE NEW YORK SAFE ACT

Tioga County February Second Regular Meeting 2-12-2013 by Evan Hempel