Author Archives: Evan (admin)

Town of Tompkins resolution opposing the NY SAFE act

In Support of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution – Resolution 06-2013

On Motion by Buttel, Seconded by LaTourette, it was Resolved that the Town of Tompkins opposes the enactment of any legislation that would infringe upon the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms and consider such laws to be unnecessary beyond lawful legislative authority granted to our state representative’s as there is no documented correlation between gun control measures and crime reduction.

Vote: All AYEs (unanimous)
Motion Carried

The March resolution confirmed at April 8 meeting, with this meeting minutes update:
Received letter from our NY State Senator John J. Bonacic stating he was in agreement with our Resolution Supporting of the Second Amendment.

Town of Pittstown resolution to support Kathy Marchione’s repeal of the safe gun act

Resolution to support Kathy Marchione’s repeal of the safe gun act.  Passed unanimously March 11th

#29-2013

WHEREAS, the members of the Town Board of the Town of Pittstown desire to support Senator Kathy Marchione and Senate Bill S3948-2013, and her efforts to preserve and protect the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding New Yorkers by repealing or replacing restrictive sections of the NY SAFE Act, Section 58 of Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2013 of the State of New York and related provisions;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: King; Second: Demars that, the members of the Town Board of the Town of Pittstown would like to support Senator Kathy Marchione, Senate Bill S3948-2013 and her efforts to preserve and protect the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding New Yorkers by repealing or replacing restrictive sections of the NY SAFE Act, Section 58 of Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2013 of the State of New York and related provisions.

Vote: Ayes – all; Nays – none.

Town of Preble resolution calling for repeal of the NY SAFE act

Motion made by Linda Riehlman, seconded by Peter Knapp
RESOLUTION #20:

To authorize the Supervisor, James Doring, and Town Clerk, Jane Davenport, to complete the declaration regarding the Second Amendment and forward same to CC Chairman Mike Park; Governor Mario Cuomo; Senator James Seward; Assembly Member 125th District Barbara Lifton; Assembly Member 129th District Brian M. Kolf, and Assembly Member 123rd District Gary Finch

Peter Knapp(aye), Dave Morse(aye) Linda Riehlman(aye)

WHEREAS, The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms is guaranteed as an Individual Right under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution of the State of New York, and;

WHEREAS, The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms for defense of Life, Liberty, and property, is regarded as an Inalienable Right by the People of the Town of Preble, New York, and;

WHEREAS, the People of the Town of Preble, New York, derive economic benefit and recreation from all safe forms of firearms conducted within the Town of Preble using all types of firearms allowable under the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York, and;

WHEREAS, The New York Assembly and the New York Senate, being duly elected by the People of the State of New York and being duly sworn by their Oath of Office to uphold the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of New York, and;

WHEREAS, the legislation passed by the New York State Legislature and signed by the Governor on January 15 infringes upon the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and bans the possession and use of firearms now employed by individual citizens of the Town of Preble, New York, for defense of Life, Liberty and Property and bans the possession and use of firearms now legally owned for safe forms of firearms conducted within the Town of Preble, New York;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND HEREBY RESOLVED that the Town of Preble’s Board, hereby calls for the repeal of the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 and declares that such legislation infringes upon the Right of People to Keep and Bear Arms, thereby considers such an act an over reach of legislative authority and is unconstitutional.

Town of Ontario resolution opposing the NY SAFE Act

RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO SAFE NEW YORK AND THE PROCESS OF ENACTMENT

WHEREAS, the United States Constitution second amendment, as well as New York State Civil Rights Law, guarantee our citizens the right to keep and bear arms; and

WHEREAS, the people of the Town of Ontario derive economic and environmental benefits from all safe forms of recreation involving firearms, including hunting and target shooting; and

WHEREAS, this legislation creates an environment in our area and across the state which is hostile to gun manufactures and those who sell and service firearms; and

WHEREAS, requiring law-abiding gun owners to verify ownership of certain types of firearms every five years, in addition to registering them on their permits, which now also must be renewed every five years, does not increase the safety of the public and is an unnecessarily burdensome to the residents of the Town of Ontario and New York State; and

WHEREAS, NY SAFE ACT fails to offer any meaningful solutions to gun violence and places increased burdens on our law abiding citizens; and

WHEREAS, the manner in which this legislation was brought forward for vote in the State Legislature is deeply disturbing to the Ontario Town Board asking for a vote in only 22 minutes rather than following the Legislatures own 3 day rule and not allowing any testimony from a variety of knowledgeable people; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, that the Ontario Town Board add its voice in opposition along with the Wayne County Legislative Board and a number of Wayne County towns to the NY SAFE Act (Chapter1 of the Laws of 2013), and request the repeal of any legislation, including the sections within the NY SAFE ACT which infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms; and further be it

RESOLVED, that the Ontario Town Board strongly encourages members of the New York State Legislature to hold public hearings to address the issue of gun violence in a way that will produce meaningful results; and further be it

RESOLVED, the Ontario Town Board opposes the imposition of any fees on New York State gun owners to finance the new provisions of the SAFE Act and any costs associated with the implementation of the SAFE Act must be borne by the State; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Clerk of the Town of Ontario certify and communicate this resolution to New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo; US Senator Charles Schumer of New York; US Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York; US Congressman Daniel Maffei of New York, representing the 24th District; New York State Senator Michael Nozzolio, representing the 54th District; New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, representing 65th District; and New York State Assemblyman Robert Oaks, representing 130th District.

Chemung County resolution opposing the NY SAFE Act

Passed unanimously March 11th.

RESOLUTION NO. 13-156

Resolution calling for the repeal of the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013

By: Graubard
Seconded by: Bennett

WHEREAS, the New York State Legislature recently enacted and Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law The New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (“NY SAFE ACT”); and

WHEREAS, this Legislation is viewed by many citizens of the State of New York as being extremely controversial as those citizens view this Legislation as infringing upon their rights guaranteed to them under the Second Amendment of the United State Constitution; and

WHEREAS, each and every issue that comes before the New York State Legislature before an enactment deserves a fair and open discussion which incorporates all points of view in order to ensure that all citizens are heard and that the Legislation incorporates the various points of view expressed during that discussion and the Legislation benefits all of the citizens of the State of New York; and

WHEREAS, the NY SAFE ACT was adopted after minimal public discussion, contains serious flaws, i.e., police officers are not exempt, and after having been on the desks of the members of the New York State Legislature for only a few hours, thereafter was literally adopted literally in the night and signed into law by Governor Andrew Cuomo; and

WHERESAS, in 2011 amendments were made to the Open Meetings Law (Public Officers Law Section 103), requiring a public body prior to a meeting to post on its website, to the extent practicable, for public benefit, all records that may be considered or discussed at that meeting; and

WHEREAS, A.107 has been pre-filed before the New York State Assembly for the 2013-2014 Regular Session, to amend the Public Officers Law (Sections 84 and 90) in relation to publishing records of public interest by agencies and the State Legislature, reading in part “…The people’s right to know the process of governmental decision-making and to review the documents and statistics leading to determinations is basic to our society. Access to such information should not be thwarted by shrouding it with the cloak of secrecy or confidentiality…”; and

WHEREAS, the State of New York has a tradition and long history of conducting its deliberations and debates in the public view and that in the enactment of the NY SAFE ACT the New York State Legislature and Governor Andrew Cuomo acted in contradiction of this long, time honored tradition of an open government; and

WHEREAS, the members of the Chemung County Legislature wish to express their concern that any future legislation which addresses the ownership of guns and the sale of ammunition in the State of New York be conducted only after an open debate pursuant to which the public is allowed to participate and express their points of view; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, that the Chemung County Legislature calls for the repeal of the NY SAFE ACT; and, be it further

RESOLVED, that the Chemung County Legislature supports the positions on the NY SAFE ACT as expressed by the New York State County Clerks Association and the New York State Sheriffs Association; and, be it further

RESOLVED, that the Clerk of the Legislature be and she hereby is directed to forward certified copies of this resolution to Governor Cuomo, members of the New York State Legislature, NYSAC, NACo, New York State Association of Towns, and each New York State County.

Ayes: Pastrick, Manchester, Sweet, Brennan, Graubard, Milliken, Woodard, Hitchcock, Bennett, Jackson, Milazzo, Madl, Strange, Draxler (Chair) (14); Excused: Hyland (1); Opposed: None

Columbia County Sheriff says he opposes parts of NY SAFE Act

Columbia County Sheriff David Harrison publicly stated his opposition to the NY Safe Act on Thursday in a meeting with the Public Safety Committee of the Columbia County Board of Supervisors. The supervisors followed with passing a resolution stating their intent to work on drafting a resolution expressing their opposition to parts of the bill.

The resolution of intent, quickly worded together by supervisors Thursday, would require cooperation with the County Government Committee and County Attorney’s Office on piecing the language together.

Harrison said he was opposed to the NY SAFE Act and would support a resolution by the supervisors to ask state legislatures to oppose the legislation, though he said “not everything is bad as far as we’re concerned.”

Read more…

Essex County: A Message from Sheriff Cutting in regards to NY SAFE Act

The recent NY Safe Act gun legislation is one of the most controversial pieces of law that I have seen in over 35 years of law enforcement experience.

I can assure you that I have no intention of going door to door to pick up any weapons legally owned by any Essex County residents, nor does any other Sheriff in New York State.

This legislation was very hastily constructed and passed without significant discussion or input from law enforcement or citizens and as such is now in a very transitory state as it has dozens of proposed amendments to fix oversights.

I recently returned from the winter conference of New York State Sheriffs and this was the primary issue addressed during this multi-day event.  One voice in the wilderness can be heard, but not very loudly.  However, the combined voices of all of the Sheriffs of New York State should resonate in the Capital as the voice of the people.  The Sheriffs Association drafted and presented a 4 page position statement on this legislation to the Governor.  To view this document, you can click on the link in this page.

The Sheriffs of New York State are diligently working to have this legislation amended into a document that does what it was intended to do and, more importantly, not infringe on the rights of the legal, law abiding citizens of our state.

Basically, this has some very good provisions that will help to keep weapons out of the hands of those who should not have them, such as the mentally ill and convicted felons.  This law increases background checks and information available to law enforcement to help avoid gun possession by those who pose an increased risk of tragic use of weapons.

Increased penalties for illegal gun possession and use are important and the added section protecting our firefighters is long overdue.

However, I personally do not see how limiting magazine capacity or arbitrarily banning certain weapons based on a few features as being very effective at preventing anyone from perpetrating these tragic acts of violence once they have committed to this senseless course of action.  Violent crime is related to a willingness to resort to violence not the presence of guns or weapons.

It makes no more sense to demonize weapons based on appearance than it does to demonize a car for DWI accidents or a deck of cards for gambling addiction.

This legislation is a start, albeit it a misguided one, but in my opinion, mental health treatment and issues would be the better place to begin to address these senseless killings.

Essex County Sheriff page

Broome County legislators plan to introduce a resolution opposing NY SAFE

Some Republican Broome County legislators plan to introduce a resolution this month stating their opposition to New York’s new gun control law.

The legislators were joined by Broome County Executive Debbie Preston, Sheriff Dave Harder and Mental Health Commissioner Art Johnson at a news conference at the Sheriff’s Office Thursday. The officials say they’ve heard a lot of anger from their constituents who oppose the new restrictions which ban certain assault weapons, limit the size of ammunition clips to 7 bullets and force mental health providers to report on their patients.

Read more…

Lewis County Sheriff reflects on his gun rally attendance

Three bus loads of people headed from the North Country to Albany Thursday to fight for their Second Amendment rights.

Members of the Lewis County community were escorted by Lewis County Sheriff Michael Carpinelli to a demonstration against New York’s SAFE Act.

Carpinelli says he was proud to attend the rally to address issues with the new law and to show that upstate can peacefully demonstrate their knowledge on the matter. He says the people he serves don’t feel any safer and believe the law does not help protect those who need it most.

Read more…

Oneida County Sheriff Maciol’s position on the NY SAFE act

Sheriff Maciol responds to the New York SAFE Act.

Over the past few weeks, a number of county residents have inquired as to Sheriff Maciol’s position regarding the recently passed New York SAFE Act.  Sheriff Maciol had this to say, “As a gun owner and strong supporter of the Second Amendment, I do not support any part of this law that restricts the law abiding citizens of Oneida County and standby the position previously articulated by the New York State Sheriffs’ Association.”

Since Governor Cuomo’s announcement of the NY SAFE Act, Sheriff Maciol, along with  Undersheriff Robert Swenszkowski, have been diligently educating themselves about this new law.  As it pertains to the NY SAFE Act, the Sheriff and Undersheriff have researched the powers of the Office of Sheriff, related case law, and statutory duties, in order to evaluate the legal authority of the Sheriff.  “It is not my prerogative to pick and choose which laws I want to enforce and which I don’t.  Such discrimination would be merely a different form of the “tyranny” which some feel the NY SAFE Act embodies.” said Sheriff Maciol.  The Sheriff believes that such arbitrary use of executive power to determine who shall be subject to the law and who shall not, is the very definition of tyranny.

The Sheriff cannot abstain from enforcing laws based on his own interpretation that it may conflict with the Constitution.  Chief Justice John Marshall famously said, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.”  Accordingly, it is up to the court system to decide whether the law is unconstitutional or not.  This is a basic function of our system of checks and balances between the three branches of government, and is reserved entirely to the judiciary.  The process of judicial review is already at work throughout New York in a number of cases brought before various courts in the state.  A Buffalo-area lawyer has gone to court contending the ban is unconstitutional and a judge there has ordered the state to answer by April.  Over 1000 people that have joined as plaintiffs and filed suit in Albany County Court contending the governor’s use of a Message of Necessity to push the bill through was flawed.  State lawyers will have to be in court on March 11, 2013 to explain why the court shouldn’t issue an injunction halting the law.  Additionally, there is a pending lawsuit originating out of Westchester County also addressing the NY SAFE Act.  This is the process that citizens must abide by, which was established by our founding fathers.  There also remains the possibility of the repeal of the NY SAFE Act through legislative action.  Citizens are encouraged to contact their respective Senators and Assemblypersons to give them input on this issue.

During the 2013 New York State Sheriff’s Association’s winter conference, Sheriff Maciol, along with Undersheriff Swenszkowski, participated in the drafting of the NYSSA letter in response to the NY SAFE Act and continue to stand by the responsible actions of the Association and its members.  The NYSSA Association letter to Governor Cuomo was supported by Sheriff Maciol and 51 fellow Sheriffs of New York.

The NY SAFE act has a number of implementations that will help law enforcement and the public for enhancing effective gun control regarding individuals that should not have access to weapons.  However, there are many parts of this law, such as the redefinition of “assault weapon” and the ammunition capacity restraints, that will not contribute meaningfully towards crime prevention.  Sheriff Maciol believes restrictions in this law will only affect law abiding citizens and encroaches on the Second Amendment, and because of this he does not support it.  Sheriff Maciol states, “I consider the manner that the NY SAFE Act was deliberated and passed to be irresponsible and a disservice to the citizens of New York State .  I will continue to advocate that changes be made to the NY SAFE Act to restore the rights of gun owners that have been so carelessly taken away.”

The people of New York State are in a unique situation as they now have a state gun control law that is even more restrictive than the federal regulations being considered.  Sheriff Maciol is calling upon the NY State Senate and Assembly to revise the NY SAFE Act restrictions on magazine capacity, assault weapon classification, and registration of such weapons, to mirror the law prior to the NY SAFE Act being implemented.

Sheriff Maciol feels that In addition to the recommendations of the New York State Sheriff’s Association, focus should also be concentrated on the criminal element in relation to firearms enforcement.  Funding could then be directed to county law enforcement agencies in order to combat gun crimes and the criminals that possess guns illegally through the creation of task forces, localgun reward programs, and shared intelligence within the law enforcement community.

Sheriff Maciol declared, “I am fortunate to live in a country which allows me to voice my displeasure with the very law I am required to enforce.  But I cannot, in good conscience avail myself of one right conferred by the Constitution, and at the same time assume the authority conferred by that same document to others within our system of government.  To forego due process and ignore the law as it stands, would be an injustice to the people of this County, and would be as abhorrent to the Constitution as some say this new law is. Our government has a duty to its citizens to preserve their rights and not infringe upon them.  The office I hold is one of great importance. It calls for responsible decisions and actions.  I hold the Oath of Office I took to defend the Constitution very seriously and whole heartedly stand by it and the citizens of Oneida County .”