Author Archives: Evan (admin)

Allegany County resolution calling for the repeal of the NY SAFE act

RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE REPEAL OF THE NEW YORK SAFE ACT OF 2013

Offered by: Ways and Means Committee

WHEREAS, the New York State Legislature recently enacted and Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law The New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (“NY SAFE ACT”); and

WHEREAS, this Legislation is viewed by many citizens of the State of New York as being extremely controversial as those citizens view this Legislation as infringing upon their rights guaranteed to them under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution; and

WHEREAS, each and every issue that comes before the New York State Legislature before an enactment deserves a fair and open discussion which incorporates all points of view in order to ensure that all citizens are heard and that the Legislation incorporates the various points of view expressed during that discussion and benefits all of the citizens of the State of New York; and

WHEREAS, the NY SAFE ACT was adopted after minimal public discussion, contains serious flaws, i.e., police officers are not exempt, and having been on the desks of the members of the New York State Legislature for only a few hours, thereafter was literally adopted in the night and signed into law by Governor Andrew Cuomo; and

WHEREAS, in 2011 amendments were made to the Open Meetings Law (Public Officers Law Section 103), requiring a public body prior to a meeting to post on its website, to the extent practicable, for public benefit all records that may be considered or discussed at that meeting; and

WHEREAS, A.107 has been pre-filed before the New fork State Assembly for the 2013- 2014 Regular Session, to amend the Public Officers Law (Sections 84 and 90) in relation to publishing records of public interest by agencies ad the State Legislature, reading in part “…The people’s right to know the process of governmeçtal decision-making and to review the documents and statistics leading to determinations is basic to ouf society. Access to such information should not be thwarted by shrouding it with the cloak of secrecy or confidentiality.. and

WHEREAS, the State of New York has a tradition and long history of conducting its deliberations and debates in the public view and that in the enactment of the NY SAFE ACT the New York State Legislature and Governor Andrew Cuomo acted in contradiction of this long, time honored tradition of an open government; and

WHEREAS, the members of the Inter County Association of Western New York and the Inter County Legislative Committee of the Adirondacks at a joint meeting held February 6, 2013, at Albany, New York, expressed their concern that any legislation which addresses the ownership of guns and the sale of ammunition in the State of New York be conducted only after an open debate pursuant to which the public is allowed to participate and express their points of view; now, therefore; be it

RESOLVED:

1. That the Allegany County Board of Legislators calls for the repeal of the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 (“NY SAFE ACT”);

2. That the Allegany County Board of Legislators supports the positions adopted by resolution from the New York State County Clerk’s Association and the State Sheriff’s Association.

3. That the Allegany County Board of Legislators directs that certified copies of this resolution be forwarded to Governor Andrew Cuomo, members of the New York State Legislature, NYSAC, NACO, New York State Association of Towns, and each New York State County.

Steuben County Legislature Asks For Repeal of State Gun Laws

The Steuben County Legislature is sending a resolution to Albany, asking Governor Andrew Cuomo and state lawmakers to repeal the Safe New York Act.

“We asked for a total repeal of it,” said Steuben County Republican Majority Leader Gary Swackhamer. “It’s a terrible law, that affects a lot of gun owners and affects the 2nd amendment, and they passed it with less than 10 hours of total (by both houses) review.”

Read more…

Saratoga County chairman opposes SAFE ACT

Weeks after the county Sheriffs’ PBA blasted Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s SAFE ACT legislation, Alan Grattidge, chairman of the county’s Board of Supervisors, released a statement saying it should be repealed. Grattidge and other supervisors from the county plan to go to Albany on Thursday to speak to state leaders about their concerns. It’s a pretty risky strategy opposing a governor who is notoriously sensitive about criticism and presently has the power to name the locations of where casinos would go if they are legalized by voters. Also, the county continues to operate without a county clerk, and is waiting on the governor to make an appointment.

Read more…

NY SAFE Act 02252013 by Dennis Yusko

Wheatfield joins call for SAFE Act repeal

Passed 2/25
WheatfieldSafeArticle

The Wheatfield Town Board on Monday joined the Niagara County Legislature and other municipalities across the state in calling for repeal of the NY SAFE Act.

The board unanimously passed motion that echoed the call for a repeal of the gun control act passed by the County Legislature last week.

“I think we all agree that even if you agree with parts of the law or the whole law, it was rushed through (by the state),” Supervisor Bob Cliffe said. “It needs to be repealed and started over.”

Read more…

Sullivan legislator to test support for backing gun-law repeal

Benson said he will test the waters when the Legislature meets on Thursday. Since the passage of the state’s SAFE Act, constituents have been calling him to denounce the legislation as unnecessary and an infringement on Second Amendment rights, he said.

“They think it’s a ridiculous law and we didn’t need it,” he said. “They thought there were enough laws on the books, and they (the state) should enforce the laws that they have.”

Read more…

Starting a resolution in your County

First realize the power of one person taking action. Take a look at Mattie Zarpentine’s experience! (see below)

Contact your legislators (usually emails and phone numbers are on the County website). Let them know you’ve been watching nearby counties pass resolutions and you want them to pass one too. Let them know that the majority of NY Counties oppose the act. Give them copies of resolutions you like (this way you steer at least the initial draft).

If they’re still not sure, then let them know that their action on this issue will determine if you back a primary against them next election cycle.


Mattie Zarpentine’s experience starting the process of getting the act repealed in Orleans County

First, let me say that what gave me the push was listening to Lisa Donovan speak at the Feb. 8th “blizzard” rally in Albany. She spoke of the importance of women speaking up. It really struck home with me and I immediately got to work.

I wrote my county legislators and town board members on Sunday, the 10th. I heard back on Monday, the 11th, from the County chairman that I was the first to make the request and that he had expected more and sooner! I was shocked! Do not assume that someone else is doing the asking! They were more than willing to work on this and put a resolution on their Wednesday, the 13th, board agenda as an add-on. I made sure I was there to speak publicly on the issue. The resolution was read, in it’s entirety, and passed unanimously! In less than 4 days!

The gun banners want the public to believe that they are doing what women want: protecting innocent children. They make it sound like they are just taking away the “scary guns” to keep us vulnerable ones safe. Women must speak up and show that we are tax paying, hard working citizens. We are moms, wives, daughters, sisters and…gun owners! We do not appreciate our rights being trampled upon. We are not criminals!

In my appeal to the county and my town, I shared much of that. I also shared how, like the rest of the country, I was horrified at the tragedy of Sandy Hook, but the NY SAFE Act did nothing to prevent a tragedy like that from happening again. They used a tragedy solely to push their agenda.

I shared that I come from a long line of Patriots fighting in many of America’s wars dating back to the American Revolution. Their bravery and sacrifice are the reason why I fight for the Constitution today.

“Band-aid legislation” will not solve the problem of gun violence and crime. This issue is multi-faceted and needs to be addressed from many angles.

I think it helps to let the county/town you are appealing to know that they are not alone. Share with them others that have already passed legislation. If possible, share actual documentation. My county of Orleans has a beautifully written resolution that would be good to share.

Thanks,
Mattie

NYS Conference of Local Mental Hygiene Directors Memo on NY SAFE act

Regarding the local Director of Community Services (DCS) duty to receive and investigate reports from mental health practitioners pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law 9.46 in the “NY SAFE Act” 

 The Law: Chapter 1 of the laws of 2013, also known as the “NY SAFE Act,” includes a new Section 9.46 of NYS Mental Hygiene Law which requires all mental health practitioners to report to the local Director of Community Services(DCS) or their designee, any person they are treating who they believe is likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others. The DCS or designee at that point would be required to assess the practitioners report to determine if the DCS agrees that the person is likely to engage in such conduct, confirm that the reporter is in fact a “mental health practitioner” as defined under MHL 9.46 (a physician, psychologist, RN, or LCSW), and to then pass on the potentially dangerous individual’s name and other non-clinical information to the NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services. This new legal mandate takes effect on March 16, 2013.

The Problem: Initial discussions regarding this new provision of law with hospitals across the State indicate that it is their belief that all admissions to psychiatric units (whether voluntary or involuntary) will require a report pursuant to 9.46 to be filed with the DCS or designee. The most recent available hospital data show over 210,000 psychiatric discharges in the year 2010 alone.  This will likely translate into over 200,000 reports to be received, evaluated, and passed on to DCJS from hospitals alone; and this number does not include the numerous others who might meet the 9.46 criteria who are not admitted to hospitals and whose names will be reported to the DCS or designee by practitioners in other settings, such as outpatient clinics and private practices.

Local Mental Health offices are simply not set up to do this type of reporting so the need to receive and assess all of these new reports will require the hiring of at least hundreds, if not more than a thousand, of additional local staff on a statewide basis. This will cost local governments millions of dollars per year. In addition, due in part to the poor way in which the new statute is drafted, New York City and the other 57 counties in the state could become liable for damages and legal costs resulting from lawsuits which will be brought by persons affected by the DCS’s agreement or disagreement with the diagnosis of the mental health professional.

This provision is an unfunded mandate of an unknown and potentially disastrous magnitude, for which localities are neither equipped nor funded to implement. If the statute’s intent is simply to gather names, then the mental health professionals can report directly to DCJS. If the intent is to really assess each of these reports then that should be done by a state agency.  To require local authorities to take on this huge responsibility and enormous potential liability with no resources in the current financial atmosphere is both unrealistic and unfair.

The Solution: Remove the Director of Community Services reporting requirement from Mental Hygiene Law 9.46,and allow mental health practitioners to file reports directly with the Division of Criminal Justice Services. This process would be analogous to the Child Abuse Central Registry and to reports that will be filed under the new Justice Center legislation, beginning in July of 2013.

Conference of Local Mental Hygiene Directors Memo on NY SAFE act by Evan Hempel

Elmira Police Department Retired Officers Association

The Elmira Police Department
Retired Officers Association
247 Jackson Creek Road
Erin, New York 14838

February 23, 2013

The Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor of New York State
NYS State Capitol Building Albany, NY 12224

Dear Governor Cuomo,

The Elmira Police Department Retired Officers Association (EPDROA) is
comprised of approximately sixty (60) former police officers from the City
of Elmira, and surrounding agencies. As such the members have over 1,500
years of combined law enforcement experience. The membership of the
Association have asked that this letter be sent and approved the following
content.

The members of the EPDROA are very concerned about the passage of the
New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act. After thoughtful
study, we find that there are a few commendable parts to the law. Allowing
pistol permit holders to opt out of having their names released pursuant to
a F.O.I.L. request, and tighter scrutiny of persons who are dangerously
mentally ill are steps in the right direction. Enhanced background checks
might also be good, as long as the pedigree information of the weapon is not
included.

The remainder of the SAFE Act however is seriously flawed. These serious
flaws are understandable in light of the hap-hazard and reckless manner in
which this legislation was hastily cobbled together. As officers who have
for years had to read, understand and enforce the laws of this State, it is
inconceivable that no one thought to include a law-enforcement exemption.
Additionally, officers cannot enter school grounds without becoming
criminals.

One of the most offensive aspects of the manner in which this assault on
our rights was accomplished was your use of a ‘message of necessity’. There
was no legitimate reason for this. You stooped to this parliamentary
slight-of-hand for the sole purpose of circumventing the three-day maturing
process. Many legislators had only twenty (20) minutes to read and try to
understand the fifty-six (56) sections of this bill. Having reviewed this
legislation, it is clear that no one could have read and comprehended the
bill and understood its many implications in such short time. Further, none
of the legislators had the opportunity to get input or feedback from their
constituents, or other stakeholders. Even members of law enforcement were
not consulted. This is one of the most basic tenets of a representative
democracy. This entire process was one of deception, secrecy, withholding of
information and exclusion of the public. These are the actions of a banana
republic dictator, not the Governor of New York State. Your actions may have
been illegal, and were certainly unethical. We the members of the EPDROA
denounce this behavior in the harshest manner.

The SAFE Act is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to regulate
lawful gun ownership out of existence. We note with serious concern that you
have previously stated that outright confiscation of weapons was a
possibility. Therefore we completely understand the fear that the citizens
of New York State have when told that they will have to register their
weapons. As any student of history knows, registration always precedes
confiscation. There is now a well-advertised resistance movement to oppose
this law. The citizens of the state of New York are saying NO! As citizens
begin to distrust their law enforcement officers, there will be ever
increasing confrontations, needless confrontations. There will be no
winners.

The simple fact is that restricting the rights of law abiding gun owners
will do nothing to stem the gun violence that we now face. The $35 million
that you wish to spend on this unconstitutional law will be a complete
waste, just as the $44 million was for the Combined Ballistic Identification
System.

Not only are the gun rights of every citizen of New York State
guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, they are also
codified in the New York Civil Rights Law, Article 2, §4. Governor Cuomo, if
someone opposed the rights of a black person to exercise the civil right to
vote, they would be called a racist bigot. If someone opposed the rights of
a Jewish person, to exercise the civil right to attend their Synagogue, they
would be an anti-Semitic bigot. If someone opposed the civil right of a
woman to attend a college that she was otherwise qualified for, they would
be called a sexist bigot. In light of your attack on our gun liberties, why
should we not refer to you as a liberty bigot?

We, the members of the EPDROA are well acquainted with all kinds of
violence. We are the ones who have had to stop the bleeding of wounded
victims before the EMT’s arrive. We are the ones who have chased armed
criminals through back yards in the dark of night. We are the ones who have
seen the puddles of blood, and yes sometimes it has been our own blood. We
are the ones who have had to notify the next-of-kin in many types of
tragedies. Yes, we are well acquainted with violence, and we don’t like it.
However, every one of us understands that crime and violence comes from the
human heart, not an inanimate object.

In closing the membership of the EPDROA perceives that you used the
events at Sandy Hook Elementary and Webster New York as an excuse to
sledgehammer this unconstitutional, unethical, and mistake laden law through
the Legislature in the middle of the night. We believe that you have
violated your oath of office. It is appalling to think that you would
capitalize on the deaths of children, and savage the constitutional and
civil rights of the citizens of New York State.

Yours truly,

Christopher F. Kamas Thomas P. Breitung
President Vice President

James E. Wandell Patrick J. Pariso
Secretary Treasurer

cc: Elmira Police Benevolent Association
Chemung County Executive
Chemung County Legislature Representatives
Congressman Tom Reed
Senator Thomas F. O’Mara
Assemblyman Christopher S. Friend

Greene County sheriff opposes NY SAFE act

Sheriff Seeley began saying that while he supports several aspects of the law, including that which addresses the mentally ill; the section which requires gunowners to keep weapons inaccessible in homes where a resident has been involuntarily committed, convicted of a crime or is the subject of an order of protection; the “opt-out” clause which places a restriction on FOIL requests, allowing license pistol permit holders to keep information private and confidential; and that portion of the law which enhances penalties for killing of first responders — firefighters and emergency medical services — by making it first degree murder, requiring life without parole.

Other than that, Seeley said he stands with the people in the room and will do everything in his power to uphold their constitutional rights.

Seeley also said that as Sheriff he represents all the people in Greene County and he has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York, and he will continue to enforce all laws of the state and protect the rights of all citizens, including those rights guaranteed by those constitutions.

Read more…

Seneca county to consider resolution calling for repeal of so called NY SAFE act

2. ISSUE: New York State SAFE Act

DESCRIPTION: The State of New York, apparently in reaction to recent acts of violence recently passed legislation virtually without preparation or study, severely affecting the rights of New York residents to maintain firearms. This legislation, currently being challenged in the courts, restricts the loading of firearm magazines to seven rounds with no apparent exception for law enforcement personnel, makes unlawful the possession of magazines and firearms currently lawfully owned by tens of thousands of New Yorkers, restricts private sale of firearms and requires licensing or relicensing of firearms previously not requiring license or for which licenses were obtained without need for periodic renewal. It is believed that many County residents are deeply concerned with this legislation, its effects and the undue haste with which it was enacted.

ACTION: Recommendation by the Committee that the Board of Supervisors pass a resolution calling for repeal of the so called New York SAFE Act of 2013.

Source: page 8 of linked PDF